Literature DB >> 19648497

In vitro digestibility techniques to predict apparent total tract energy digestibility of wheat in grower pigs.

P R Regmi1, N S Ferguson, R T Zijlstra.   

Abstract

In vitro digestibility techniques have been developed to predict the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy and DE content of mixed diets and feedstuffs including barley grain in swine. However, the techniques have not been tested properly for their accuracy in predicting the variation in ATTD of energy and DE content within wheat grain. The objectives were 1) to compare two 3-step in vitro digestibility techniques with either cellulase (IVD-CEL) or Viscozyme (a multienzyme complex to digest fiber; Novozymes, Bagsvaerd, Denmark; IVD-VIS) as the third step, and differing in the amount of enzymes used and the duration of digestion, for their accuracy in predicting ATTD of energy and DM of wheat in grower pigs; and 2) to develop equations to predict ATTD of energy of different batches of wheat. Wheat grain samples (n = 20) with a wide range in quality were collected; the ADF and CP content ranged from 3.3 to 6.2% and from 11.2 to 20.8% (DM basis), respectively. The ATTD of energy was determined using barrows (n = 60, 30.7 +/- 4.7 kg of initial BW) in 2 periods with 6 observations per sample, and ranged from 73.3 to 84.5%. In IVD-CEL, 1 g of ground wheat was digested sequentially in digestion solutions containing pepsin (10 mg/36.5 mL) for 6 h, pancreatin (150 mg/54.5 mL) for 18 h, and cellulase (75 mg/55.5 mL) for 24 h. In IVD-VIS, 0.5 g of ground wheat sample was digested sequentially in solutions containing pepsin (25 mg/36.5 mL) for 2 h, 3 mL of pancreatin (100 mg/54.5 mL) for 6 h, and Viscozyme (0.5 mL/65.3 mL) for 18 h. The in vitro energy and DM digestibility ranged from 79.8 to 91.0% and from 82.0 to 91.5% for IVD-CEL, and ranged from 76.2 to 87.0% and from 79.1 to 89.4% for IVD-VIS, respectively. The R(2) between ATTD of energy and in vitro DM and energy digestibility for IVD-VIS (0.82 and 0.73, respectively) was greater than for IVD-CEL (0.55 and 0.54, respectively). The equation y = 1.05x - 8.85 using the in vitro DM digestibility value from IVD-VIS can predict the ATTD of the energy of wheat in swine with an SE of prediction of 1.2. The relationship between in vitro DM digestibility and grain characteristics such as ADF was stronger for the IVD-VIS than for the IVD-CEL technique (R(2) = 0.89 vs. 0.70). In conclusion, the IVD-VIS, but not the IVD-CEL, technique can accurately (R(2) = 0.82) predict the ATTD of energy in wheat in grower pigs. Therefore, the IVD-VIS technique might be useful as the reference analysis to calibrate analytical equipment to predict the ATTD of energy rapidly in wheat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19648497     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Use of in vitro dry matter digestibility and gas production to predict apparent total tract digestibility of total dietary fiber for growing pigs.

Authors:  Z Huang; P E Urriola; G C Shurson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Determination of chemical composition, energy content, and amino acid digestibility in different wheat cultivars fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  Jinbiao Zhao; Shouwen Tang; Xingjian Zhou; Wenxuan Dong; Shuai Zhang; Chengfei Huang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine.

Authors:  Gerald C Shurson; Yuan-Tai Hung; Jae Cheol Jang; Pedro E Urriola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effects of an enzyme complex on in vitro dry matter digestibility of feed ingredients for pigs.

Authors:  Changsu Kong; Chan Sol Park; Beob Gyun Kim
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-06-17

5.  An enzyme complex increases in vitro dry matter digestibility of corn and wheat in pigs.

Authors:  Kyu Ree Park; Chan Sol Park; Beob Gyun Kim
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-11

Review 6.  Alternative prediction methods of protein and energy evaluation of pig feeds.

Authors:  Ewa Święch
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-03

7.  Dietary multi-enzyme complex improves In Vitro nutrient digestibility and hind gut microbial fermentation of pigs.

Authors:  Neeraja Recharla; Duwan Kim; Sivasubramanian Ramani; Minho Song; Juncheol Park; Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian; Pradeep Puligundla; Sungkwon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Trends in feed evaluation for poultry with emphasis on in vitro techniques.

Authors:  Faegheh Zaefarian; Aaron J Cowieson; Katrine Pontoppidan; M Reza Abdollahi; Velmurugu Ravindran
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-01-09

9.  Effects of Post-harvest Storage Duration and Variety on Nutrient Digestibility and Energy Content Wheat in Finishing Pigs.

Authors:  P P Guo; P L Li; Z C Li; H H Stein; L Liu; T Xia; Y Y Yang; Y X Ma
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Impact of Thermal and High-Pressure Treatments on the Microbiological Quality and In Vitro Digestibility of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae.

Authors:  Mairead Campbell; Jordi Ortuño; Alexandros Ch Stratakos; Mark Linton; Nicolae Corcionivoschi; Tara Elliott; Anastasios Koidis; Katerina Theodoridou
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.