Literature DB >> 19648254

Impact of ionic current variability on human ventricular cellular electrophysiology.

Lucía Romero1, Esther Pueyo, Martin Fink, Blanca Rodríguez.   

Abstract

Abnormalities in repolarization and its rate dependence are known to be related to increased proarrhythmic risk. A number of repolarization-related electrophysiological properties are commonly used as preclinical biomarkers of arrhythmic risk. However, the variability and complexity of repolarization mechanisms make the use of cellular biomarkers to predict arrhythmic risk preclinically challenging. Our goal is to investigate the role of ionic current properties and their variability in modulating cellular biomarkers of arrhythmic risk to improve risk stratification and identification in humans. A systematic investigation into the sensitivity of the main preclinical biomarkers of arrhythmic risk to changes in ionic current conductances and kinetics was performed using computer simulations. Four stimulation protocols were applied to the ten Tusscher and Panfilov human ventricular model to quantify the impact of +/-15 and +/-30% variations in key model parameters on action potential (AP) properties, Ca(2+) and Na(+) dynamics, and their rate dependence. Simulations show that, in humans, AP duration is moderately sensitive to changes in all repolarization current conductances and in L-type Ca(2+) current (I(CaL)) and slow component of the delayed rectifier current (I(Ks)) inactivation kinetics. AP triangulation, however, is strongly dependent only on inward rectifier K(+) current (I(K1)) and delayed rectifier current (I(Kr)) conductances. Furthermore, AP rate dependence (i.e., AP duration rate adaptation and restitution properties) and intracellular Ca(2+) and Na(+) levels are highly sensitive to both I(CaL) and Na(+)/K(+) pump current (I(NaK)) properties. This study provides quantitative insights into the sensitivity of preclinical biomarkers of arrhythmic risk to variations in ionic current properties in humans. The results show the importance of sensitivity analysis as a powerful method for the in-depth validation of mathematical models in cardiac electrophysiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19648254     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00263.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  55 in total

Review 1.  Exploiting mathematical models to illuminate electrophysiological variability between individuals.

Authors:  Amrita X Sarkar; David J Christini; Eric A Sobie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Parameter sensitivity analysis of stochastic models provides insights into cardiac calcium sparks.

Authors:  Young-Seon Lee; Ona Z Liu; Hyun Seok Hwang; Bjorn C Knollmann; Eric A Sobie
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Numerical models based on a minimal set of sarcolemmal electrogenic proteins and an intracellular Ca(2+) clock generate robust, flexible, and energy-efficient cardiac pacemaking.

Authors:  Victor A Maltsev; Edward G Lakatta
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.000

4.  In silico screening of the impact of hERG channel kinetic abnormalities on channel block and susceptibility to acquired long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Lucia Romero; Beatriz Trenor; Pei-Chi Yang; Javier Saiz; Colleen E Clancy
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.000

5.  Transmural heterogeneity of repolarization and Ca2+ handling in a model of mouse ventricular tissue.

Authors:  Vladimir E Bondarenko; Randall L Rasmusson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Towards a better understanding of QT interval variability.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2011-12

Review 7.  Modern perspectives on numerical modeling of cardiac pacemaker cell.

Authors:  Victor A Maltsev; Yael Yaniv; Anna V Maltsev; Michael D Stern; Edward G Lakatta
Journal:  J Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 8.  Evolution of strategies to improve preclinical cardiac safety testing.

Authors:  Gary Gintant; Philip T Sager; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  Regression analysis for constraining free parameters in electrophysiological models of cardiac cells.

Authors:  Amrita X Sarkar; Eric A Sobie
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Computational approaches to understand cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias.

Authors:  Byron N Roberts; Pei-Chi Yang; Steven B Behrens; Jonathan D Moreno; Colleen E Clancy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.