Literature DB >> 19647926

Lymph node metastasis in intermediate-risk penile squamous cell cancer: a two-centre experience.

Ben E Hughes1, Joost A P Leijte, Bin K Kroon, Majid A Shabbir, Tom W Swallow, Sue D Heenan, Cathy M Corbishley, Hester H van Boven, Matthew J A Perry, Nick A Watkin, Simon Horenblas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis in G2T1 penile cancer has been previously reported as 0-50% and is classified as "intermediate" in the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. The management of impalpable regional nodes in this cohort of patients remains contentious and varies among treatment centres depending on tumour factors and local resources.
OBJECTIVES: To establish the risk of LN metastasis in G2T1 disease. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: We interrogated the databases of two referral centres for penile cancer. MEASUREMENTS: Out of 902 patients, 117 (13%) patients were identified with G2T1 cancers. Those with palpable inguinal nodes (cN1) underwent early inguinal LN dissection (iLND). Those with clinically node negative (cN0) inguinal basins were either observed or surgically staged with iLND or by dynamic sentinel LN biopsy (DSLNB). Median follow-up was 44 mo, with minimum follow-up of 6 mo. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Fifteen of 117 (13%) patients with G2T1 cancer had LN metastasis at initial staging or during follow-up. Six of 12 (50%) cN1 patients had histologically proven LN metastasis on iLND. One hundred five patients were cN0 at presentation. Ten cN0 patients had prophylactic iLND, none of which yielded LN metastasis; 5 of 64 (8%) cN0 patients who had DSLNB had tumour-positive LNs, and 4 of 31 (13%) cN0 patients who were observed developed LN metastasis during follow-up. In cN0 patients, the risk of LN metastasis at initial staging or during surveillance was 9%.
CONCLUSIONS: We consider that in cN0 patients with G2T1 penile cancer, the risk of developing metastases during surveillance warrants surgical and potentially curative staging. However, the morbidity of prophylactic bilateral iLND is too great to justify a detection rate of 9%. Less morbid alternatives such as DSLNB are advisable in G2T1 disease.
Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19647926     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  12 in total

1.  Validation of predictors for lymph node status in penile cancer: Results from a population-based cohort.

Authors:  X Melody Qu; D Robert Siemens; Alexander V Louie; Darwin Yip; Aamer Mahmud
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Advanced penile cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan E Heinlen; David D Buethe; Daniel Joseph Culkin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Feasibility of performing dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as a delayed procedure in penile cancer.

Authors:  Savvas Omorphos; Zia Saad; Manit Arya; Alex Freeman; Peter Malone; Raj Nigam; Jamshed Bomanji; Asif Muneer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Making surgery safer by centralization of care: impact of case load in penile cancer.

Authors:  Joren Vanthoor; Anita Thomas; Igor Tsaur; Maarten Albersen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  [Penile carcinoma: diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  C Protzel; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Reproducibility of histopathologic tumor grading in penile cancer--results of a European project.

Authors:  Ch Kakies; A Lopez-Beltran; E Comperat; A Erbersdobler; R Grobholz; O W Hakenberg; A Hartmann; L-C Horn; A K Höhn; J Köllermann; G Kristiansen; R Montironi; M Scarpelli; Ch Protzel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Metastatic penile carcinoma - an update on the current diagnosis and treatment options.

Authors:  Dimitri Barski; Evangelos Georgas; Holger Gerullis; Thorsten Ecke
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 9.  Penile sparing surgical approaches for primary penile tumors: preserving function and appearance.

Authors:  Adam S Baumgarten; John S Fisher; Samuel M Lawindy; Jonathan G Pavlinec; Rafael E Carrion; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 10.  Penile cancer: about ten cases at the University Hospital of Rabat, review of the literature.

Authors:  Amine Slaoui; Youness Jabbour; Anouar El Ghazoui; Tarik Karmouni; Khalid Elkhader; Abdelatif Koutani; Ahmed Ibn Attaya
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.