Literature DB >> 19647357

Patient involvement in health research: a contribution to a systematic review on the effectiveness of treatments for degenerative ataxias.

P Serrano-Aguilar1, M M Trujillo-Martín, J M Ramos-Goñi, V Mahtani-Chugani, L Perestelo-Pérez, M Posada-de la Paz.   

Abstract

This study aims to incorporate patients' perspective in the design of a systematic review of scientific literature on the effectiveness of degenerative ataxias (DA) treatments. 53 patients with DA from different regions of Spain were consulted using the Delphi method, with three rounds via e-mail. In the first round, obtained information was on treatments used and relevant self-perceived health problems related to DA. The following two rounds were used to prioritize and achieve a consensus on the answers. The participation rate was 100% for all rounds. The most relevant self-perceived health problems were limitations in activities of daily living (ADL), visual and auditory problems and diminished self-esteem. The bibliographic search for the systematic review was enriched by these patient contributions. No study offered information on treatment effectiveness for the following problems prioritized by patients: ADL, social relationships, disease acceptance and quality of life. Thus some of the self-perceived DA-related health problems identified by the patients have never been investigated and should be considered to improve future research projects which should be adapted to meet patients' needs. Effective participation of patients can extend the value of systematic reviews to ensure they respond to both clinicians' information needs and patients' expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19647357     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

1.  Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Yoon Duk Hong; Daisuke Goto; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.744

2.  Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Julia Kreis; Milo A Puhan; Holger J Schünemann; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Victoria Szydlowski; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Stanley Ip; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Rachael Fleurence; David H Hickam
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  [Patient-reported and patient-weighted outcomes in ophthalmology].

Authors:  F Scheibler; R P Finger; R Grosselfinger; C-M Dintsios
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Exploring the outcomes in studies of primary frozen shoulder: is there a need for a core outcome set?

Authors:  Sara Rodgers; Stephen Brealey; Laura Jefferson; Catriona McDaid; Emma Maund; Nigel Hanchard; Lorna Goodchild; Sally Spencer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies.

Authors:  Ian P Sinha; Rosalind L Smyth; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  User involvement in a Cochrane systematic review: using structured methods to enhance the clinical relevance, usefulness and usability of a systematic review update.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Pauline Campbell; Gillian Baer; Pei Ling Choo; Jacqui Morris; Anne Forster
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-20

8.  Social and Cultural Elements Associated with Neurocognitive Dysfunctions in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 Patients.

Authors:  Roberto Emmanuele Mercadillo; Víctor Galvez; Rosalinda Díaz; Lorena Paredes; Javier Velázquez-Moctezuma; Carlos R Hernandez-Castillo; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 9.  Exploring patient and family involvement in the lifecycle of an orphan drug: a scoping review.

Authors:  Andrea Young; Devidas Menon; Jackie Street; Walla Al-Hertani; Tania Stafinski
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.123

10.  Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Declan Devane; Elizabeth Gargon; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.