Literature DB >> 19646709

Relation of structure to performance characteristics of monolithic and perfusive stationary phases.

Egor I Trilisky1, Harun Koku, Kirk J Czymmek, Abraham M Lenhoff.   

Abstract

Commercially available polymer-based monolithic and perfusive stationary phases were evaluated for their applicability in chromatography of biologics. Information on bed geometry, including that from electron microscopy (EM), was used to interpret and predict accessible volumes, binding capacities, and pressure drops. For preparative purification of biologics up to at least 7 nm in diameter, monoliths and perfusive resins are inferior to conventional stationary phases due to their low binding capacities (20-30 g/L for BSA). For larger biologics, up to several hundred nanometers in diameter, calculations from EM images predict a potential increase in binding capacity to nearly 100 g/L. The accessible volume for adenovirus calculated from the EM images matched the experimental value. While the pores of perfusive resins are essentially inaccessible to adenovirus under binding conditions, under non-adsorbing conditions the accessible intrabead porosity is almost as large as the interbead porosity. Modeling of breakthrough curves showed that the experimentally observed slow approach to full saturation can be explained by the distribution of pore sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19646709      PMCID: PMC2752694          DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  35 in total

1.  Adsorbed Layers of Ferritin at Solid and Fluid Interfaces Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 8.128

Review 2.  Monolithic stationary phases for liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography.

Authors:  Hanfa Zou; Xiaodong Huang; Mingliang Ye; Quanzhou Luo
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Sorption processes in ion-exchange chromatography of viruses.

Authors:  E I Trilisky; A M Lenhoff
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 4.  Cellular separations: a review of new challenges in analytical chemistry.

Authors:  Dimitri Pappas; Kelong Wang
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  Mass transfer kinetic mechanism in monolithic columns and application to the characterization of new research monolithic samples with different average pore sizes.

Authors:  Fabrice Gritti; Georges Guiochon
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Comparison of protein adsorption isotherms and uptake rates in preparative cation-exchange materials.

Authors:  C Chang; A M Lenhoff
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 7.  Strategies for the isolation and purification of retroviral vectors for gene therapy.

Authors:  G Braas; P F Searle; N K Slater; A Lyddiatt
Journal:  Bioseparation       Date:  1996

8.  Bacterial dry matter content and biomass estimations.

Authors:  G Bratbak; I Dundas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Affinity chromatography of cells and cell membranes.

Authors:  S K Sharma; P P Mahendroo
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1980-11-07

10.  Application of monoliths for plasmid DNA purification development and transfer to production.

Authors:  Jochen Urthaler; Robert Schlegl; Ales Podgornik; Ales Strancar; Alois Jungbauer; Roman Necina
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 4.759

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modeling of dispersion in a polymeric chromatographic monolith.

Authors:  Harun Koku; Robert S Maier; Mark R Schure; Abraham M Lenhoff
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Effect of bioparticle size on dispersion and retention in monolithic and perfusive beds.

Authors:  Egor I Trilisky; Abraham M Lenhoff
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Modeling of flow in a polymeric chromatographic monolith.

Authors:  Harun Koku; Robert S Maier; Kirk J Czymmek; Mark R Schure; Abraham M Lenhoff
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 4.  Methacrylate Polymer Monoliths for Separation Applications.

Authors:  Robert J Groarke; Dermot Brabazon
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Large-scale production and purification of VLP-based vaccines.

Authors:  Tiago Vicente; António Roldão; Cristina Peixoto; Manuel J T Carrondo; Paula M Alves
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Nonwoven Ion-Exchange Membranes with High Protein Binding Capacity for Bioseparations.

Authors:  Solomon Mengistu Lemma; Cristiana Boi; Ruben G Carbonell
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.