OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between the time of recognition of pregnancy and birth outcomes, such as premature births, low birthweight (LBW), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and infant mortality. STUDY DESIGN: A secondary analysis was performed using the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS) multistate data from 2000-2004. The sample consisted of 136,373 women who had a live childbirth. Analysis involved multiple logistic regression models, appropriately weighted for point and variance estimation to reflect the complex survey design of the PRAMS using STATA 9.2 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). RESULTS: Approximately 27.6% recognized their pregnancy late (after 6 weeks of gestation). Late recognition was significantly associated with an increased odds of having premature births (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 99% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.19), LBW (OR, 1.08; 99% CI, 1.01-1.15), and NICU admissions (OR, 1.12; 99% CI, 1.03-1.21). CONCLUSION: These results provide a rationale and an impetus for developing interventions that promote early recognition of pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between the time of recognition of pregnancy and birth outcomes, such as premature births, low birthweight (LBW), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and infant mortality. STUDY DESIGN: A secondary analysis was performed using the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System (PRAMS) multistate data from 2000-2004. The sample consisted of 136,373 women who had a live childbirth. Analysis involved multiple logistic regression models, appropriately weighted for point and variance estimation to reflect the complex survey design of the PRAMS using STATA 9.2 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). RESULTS: Approximately 27.6% recognized their pregnancy late (after 6 weeks of gestation). Late recognition was significantly associated with an increased odds of having premature births (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 99% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.19), LBW (OR, 1.08; 99% CI, 1.01-1.15), and NICU admissions (OR, 1.12; 99% CI, 1.03-1.21). CONCLUSION: These results provide a rationale and an impetus for developing interventions that promote early recognition of pregnancy.
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Jennifer L Weuve; Ann Aschengrau; Rebecca J Song; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Zoe H Larsen; Praveen Chander; Jason A Joyner; Crina M Floruta; Tess L Demeter; Jason P Weick Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Melissa M Martin; Devon L Graham; Deirdre M McCarthy; Pradeep G Bhide; Gregg D Stanwood Journal: Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today Date: 2016-06
Authors: Daniel Cummings; Kevin F Dowling; Noah J Silverstein; Alexandra S Tanner; Hamdi Eryilmaz; Jordan W Smoller; Joshua L Roffman Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 5.717