Literature DB >> 19645267

Characterization of the sunset semi-continuous carbon aerosol analyzer.

Jace J Bauer1, Xiao-Ying Yu, Robert Cary, Nels Laulainen, Carl Berkowitz.   

Abstract

The field-deployable Sunset Semi-Continuous Organic Carbon/Elemental Carbon (Sunset OCEC) aerosol analyzer utilizes the modified National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health thermal-optical method to determine total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) at near real-time. Two sets of OC and EC are available: thermal OC and EC, and optical OC and EC. The former is obtained by the thermal-optical approach, and the latter is obtained by directly determining EC optically and deriving optical OC from TC. However, the performance of the Sunset OCEC is not yet fully characterized. Two collocated Sunset OCEC analyzers, Unit A and Unit B, were used to determine the pooled relative standard deviation (RSD) and limit of detection (LOD) between September 18 and November 6, 2007 in Richland, WA. The LOD of Unit A was approximately 0.2 microgC/m3 (0.1 microgC/cm2) for TC, optical OC, and thermal OC, and 0.01 microgC/m3 (0.01 microgC/cm2) for optical EC. Similarly, Unit B had an LOD of approximately 0.3 microgC/m3 (0.2 microgC/cm2) for TC, optical OC, and thermal OC, and 0.02 microgC/m3 (0.01 microgC/cm2) for optical EC. The LOD for thermal EC is estimated to be 0.2 microgC/m3 (0.1 microgC/cm2) for both units. The pooled RSDs were 4.9% for TC (carbon mass loadings 0.6-6.0 microgC/cm2), 5.6% for optical OC (carbon mass loadings 0.6-5.4 microgC/cm2), 5.3% for thermal OC (carbon mass loadings 0.6-5.3 microgC/ cm2), and 9.6% for optical EC (carbon mass loadings 0-1.4 microgC/cm2), which indicates good precision between the instruments. The RSD for thermal EC is higher at 24.3% (carbon mass loadings 0-1.2 microgC/cm2). Low EC mass loadings in Richland contributed to the poor RSD of EC. The authors found that excessive noise from the nondispersive infrared (NDIR) laser in the Sunset OCEC analyzer could result in a worsened determination of OC and EC. It is recommended that a "quieter" NDIR laser and detector be used in the Sunset OCEC analyzer to improve quantification. Future work should re-evaluate the precision of the EC parameters in an environment favorable for EC collection. Investigation among quantification differences using various thermal-optical protocols to determine OC and EC is also in need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19645267     DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.59.7.826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  4 in total

1.  Near-Real Time Measurement of Carbonaceous Aerosol Using Microplasma Spectroscopy: Application to Measurement of Carbon Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Lina Zheng; Pramod Kulkarni; M Eileen Birch; Gregory Deye; Dionysios D Dionysiou
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  FTIR analysis of surface functionalities on particulate matter produced by off-road diesel engines operating on diesel and biofuel.

Authors:  Olga B Popovicheva; Elena D Kireeva; Natalia K Shonija; Michal Vojtisek-Lom; Jaroslav Schwarz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Comparison of measurement methods for the characterization of the black carbon emissions from a T63 turboshaft engine burning conventional and Fischer-Tropsch fuels.

Authors:  John S Kinsey; Edwin Corporan; Jelica Pavlovic; Matthew DeWitt; Christopher Klingshirn; Russell Logan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Review of Sunset OC/EC Instrument Measurements During the EPA's Sunset Carbon Evaluation Project.

Authors:  Steven Brown; Hilary Minor; Theresa O'Brien; Yousaf Hameed; Brandon Feenstra; Dustin Kuebler; Will Wetherell; Robert Day; Richard Tun; Elizabeth Landis; Joann Rice
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.686

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.