Literature DB >> 19644938

The effects of an incentive program on quality of care in diabetes management.

Anthony Scott1, Stefanie Schurer, Paul H Jensen, Peter Sivey.   

Abstract

An incentive program for general practitioners to encourage systematic and igh-quality care in chronic disease management was introduced in Australia in 1999. There is little empirical evidence and ambiguous theoretical guidance on which effects to expect. This paper evaluates the impact of the incentive program on quality of care in diabetes, as measured by the probability of ordering an HbA1c test. The empirical analysis is conducted with a unique data set and a bivariate probit model to control for the self-selection process of practices into the program. The study finds that the incentive program increased the probability of an HbA1c test being ordered by 20 percentage points and that participation in the program is facilitated by the support of Divisions of General Practice. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19644938     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  10 in total

1.  Incentives in primary care and their impact on potentially avoidable hospital admissions.

Authors:  Gianluca Fiorentini; Elisa Iezzi; Matteo Lippi Bruni; Cristina Ugolini
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-04-28

2.  Quality of diabetes follow-up care and hospital admissions.

Authors:  L F Andrade; T Rapp; C Sevilla-Dedieu
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2018-06

3.  Does higher quality of diabetes management in family practice reduce unplanned hospital admissions?

Authors:  Mark Dusheiko; Tim Doran; Hugh Gravelle; Catherine Fullwood; Martin Roland
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Quality of Disease Management and Risk of Mortality in English Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Mark Dusheiko; Hugh Gravelle; Stephen Martin; Peter C Smith
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia.

Authors:  Jessica Greene
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Simone R de Bruin; Caroline A Baan; Jeroen N Struijs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Adherence to international follow-up guidelines in type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Laurence M Renard; Valery Bocquet; Gwenaelle Vidal-Trecan; Marie-Lise Lair; Claudine Blum-Boisgard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Performing Economic Evaluation of Integrated Care: Highway to Hell or Stairway to Heaven?

Authors:  Apostolos Tsiachristas; K Viktoria Stein; Silvia Evers; Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.120

Review 9.  A systematic review of interventions to enhance access to best practice primary health care for chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jean Comino; Gawaine Powell Davies; Yordanka Krastev; Marion Haas; Bettina Christl; John Furler; Anthony Raymont; Mark F Harris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  [Compliance with process indicators in people with type 2 diabetes and linking incentives in Primary Care].

Authors:  Beatriz Pascual de la Pisa; Cristina Márquez Calzada; Carla Cuberos Sánchez; José Miguel Cruces Jiménez; Manuel Fernández Gamaza; María Isabel Martínez Martínez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 1.137

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.