Literature DB >> 19644760

Quantum dots as new-generation fluorochromes for FISH: an appraisal.

Dimitris Ioannou1, Helen G Tempest, Benjamin M Skinner, Alan R Thornhill, Michael Ellis, Darren K Griffin.   

Abstract

In the field of nanotechnology, quantum dots (QDs) are a novel class of inorganic fluorochromes composed of nanometre-scale crystals made of a semiconductor material. Given the remarkable optical properties that they possess, they have been proposed as an ideal material for use in fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). That is, they are resistant to photobleaching and they excite at a wide range of wavelengths but emit light in a very narrow band that can be controlled by particle size and thus have the potential for multiplexing experiments. The principal aim of this study was to compare the potential of QDs against traditional organic fluorochromes in both indirect (i.e. QD-conjugated streptavidin) and direct (i.e. synthesis of QD-labelled FISH probes) detection methods. In general, the indirect experiments met with a degree of success, with FISH applications demonstrated for chromosome painting, BAC mapping and use of oligonucleotide probes on human and avian chromosomes/nuclei. Many of the reported properties of QDs (e.g. brightness, 'blinking' and resistance to photobleaching) were observed. On the other hand, signals were more frequently observed where the chromatin was less condensed (e.g. around the periphery of the chromosome or in the interphase nucleus) and significant bleed-through to other filters was apparent (despite the reported narrow emission spectra). Most importantly, experimental success was intermittent (sometimes even in identical, parallel experiments) making attempts to improve reliability difficult. Experimentation with direct labelling showed evidence of the generation of QD-DNA constructs but no successful FISH experiments. We conclude that QDs are not, in their current form, suitable materials for FISH because of the lack of reproducibility of the experiments; we speculate why this might be the case and look forward to the possibility of nanotechnology forming the basis of future molecular cytogenetic applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19644760     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-009-9051-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  39 in total

1.  Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Near-infrared fluorescent type II quantum dots for sentinel lymph node mapping.

Authors:  Sungjee Kim; Yong Taik Lim; Edward G Soltesz; Alec M De Grand; Jaihyoung Lee; Akira Nakayama; J Anthony Parker; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Rita G Laurence; Delphine M Dor; Lawrence H Cohn; Moungi G Bawendi; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Near-complete suppression of quantum dot blinking in ambient conditions.

Authors:  Sungchul Hohng; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 4.  Semiconductor nanocrystals for biological imaging.

Authors:  Aihua Fu; Weiwei Gu; Carolyn Larabell; A Paul Alivisatos
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Advances in fluorescence imaging with quantum dot bio-probes.

Authors:  Fabien Pinaud; Xavier Michalet; Laurent A Bentolila; James M Tsay; Soren Doose; Jack J Li; Gopal Iyer; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Quantum dots as cellular probes.

Authors:  A Paul Alivisatos; Weiwei Gu; Carolyn Larabell
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Mechanism for enhanced optical nonlinearities and bistability by combined dielectric-electronic confinement in semiconductor microcrystallites.

Authors:  D S Chemla; D A Miller
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1986-08-01       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection.

Authors:  W C Chan; S Nie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Water-soluble quantum dots for multiphoton fluorescence imaging in vivo.

Authors:  Daniel R Larson; Warren R Zipfel; Rebecca M Williams; Stephen W Clark; Marcel P Bruchez; Frank W Wise; Watt W Webb
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Quantum dots--a versatile tool in plant science?

Authors:  Frank Müller; Andreas Houben; Peter E Barker; Yan Xiao; Josef A Käs; Michael Melzer
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 10.435

View more
  11 in total

1.  Antibody Self-Assembly Maximizes Cytoplasmic Immunostaining Accuracy of Compact Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Liang Ma; Junlong Geng; Vladimir L Kolossov; Zhiyuan Han; Yi Pei; Sung Jun Lim; Kristopher A Kilian; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 10.508

Review 2.  Making the message clear: visualizing mRNA localization.

Authors:  Timothy T Weil; Richard M Parton; Ilan Davis
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  Nanotechnology and molecular cytogenetics: the future has not yet arrived.

Authors:  Dimitris Ioannou; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Nano Rev       Date:  2010-05-03

4.  High-resolution whole-mount in situ hybridization using Quantum Dot nanocrystals.

Authors:  Andriani Ioannou; Iro Eleftheriou; Andrea Lubatti; Anna Charalambous; Paris A Skourides
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-12

5.  Combining M-FISH and Quantum Dot technology for fast chromosomal assignment of transgenic insertions.

Authors:  Mohammed Yusuf; David L V Bauer; Daniel M Lipinski; Robert E MacLaren; Richard Wade-Martins; Kalim U Mir; Emanuela V Volpi
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  Simultaneous imaging of two different cancer biomarkers using aptamer-conjugated quantum dots.

Authors:  Jonghwan Lee; Hyo Jin Kang; Hyeok Jang; Youn Jung Lee; Yong Seung Lee; Bahy A Ali; Abdulaziz A Al-Khedhairy; Soonhag Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Evaluation of quantum dot conjugated antibodies for immunofluorescent labelling of cellular targets.

Authors:  Jennifer E Francis; David Mason; Raphaël Lévy
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Micro fluorescence in situ hybridization (μFISH) for spatially multiplexed analysis of a cell monolayer.

Authors:  D Huber; J Autebert; G V Kaigala
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  Automated measurement of estrogen receptor in breast cancer: a comparison of fluorescent and chromogenic methods of measurement.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Zarrella; Madeline Coulter; Allison W Welsh; Daniel E Carvajal; Kurt A Schalper; Malini Harigopal; David L Rimm; Veronique M Neumeister
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 10.  Immunolocalization of chromosome-associated proteins in plants - principles and applications.

Authors:  Cristina Maria Pinto de Paula; Vânia Helena Techio
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.