| Literature DB >> 19644555 |
Min Zhang1, Takahiro Ono, Yongjin Chen, Xin Lv, Shun Wu, Hong Song, Ruini Zhao, Yibing Wang.
Abstract
Mandibular condyle plays an important role in the growth and reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). We aimed to obtain orthotropic elastic parameters of the condyle using a continuous-wave ultrasonic technique and to observe the effects of condylar elastic parameters on stress distribution of the TMJ using finite element analysis (FEA). Using the ultrasonic technique, all nine elastic parameters were obtained, which showed that the mandibular condyle was orthotropic. With the condyle defined as orthotropic, the occlusal stress was transferred fluently and uniformly from the mandible to the TMJ. The stress distribution in the isotropic model showed stepped variation among different anatomical structures with higher stress values in the cartilage and condyle than in the orthotropic model. We conclude that anisotropy has subtle yet significant effects on stress distribution of the TMJ and could improve the reality of simulations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19644555 PMCID: PMC2715898 DOI: 10.1155/2009/509848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Figure 1An illustration of the ultrasonic measurement process of sheep condyle. (a) Anatomic sketch of sheep mandible and condyle. (b) Condyle sample prepared for ultrasonic measurement. (c) Two-dimensional illustration of the bone material cut away so that v13/13 can be measured. (d) A three-dimensional sketch of the bone sample after all the cuts have been made (shown as hatched parts) as well as the measurement direction for each v. 1 was the antero-posterior direction, 2 was the vertical direction, and 3 was the mesio-lateral direction. indicates longitudinal wave speed, which was measured with the generation and sensing transducer in line. indicates the transverse wave speed measured with the generation and sensing transducer at a right angle.
Figure 2Finite element analysis model of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) stress. (a) Three-dimensional finite element mesh of the TMJ, including the mandible, disc (i), cartilage (ii), condyle (iii), and coracoid process (iv), with the mandible angle fixed (v) and alveolar ridge loaded by two-dimensional occlusal force vectors (vi). (b) State of stress in an orthotropic element. Each of the three material axes was assigned a value for the elastic modulus (E), and each of the three planes defined by those axes received values for the shear modulus (G) and Poisson's ratio (ν). Thus, one principle stress (σ) and two shear stress (τ) values could be calculated from each plane of the element. 1, 2, and 3 indicate the same corresponding directions as in Figure 1. (c) Twenty-nine observation points map the TMJ for stress value collection.
Ultrasound velocity and elastic property of the condyle (mean ± SD, n = 6).
| Ultrasound velocity | Elastic coefficients | Technical constants (GPa) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (×103 m/s) | (GPa) | Young's modulus | Shear modulus | Poisson's ratio | |||||
| 1.73 ± 0.04 | 4.19 ± 0.12 | 3.05 ± 0.16 | 0.88 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | |||||
| 1.79 ± 0.08 | 4.60 ± 0.21 | 3.58 ± 0.19 | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | |||||
| 1.53 ± 0.01 | 3.25 ± 0.18 | 2.73 ± 0.19 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | |||||
| 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | |||||||
| 0.93 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | |||||||
| 0.97 ± 0.03 | 0.86 ± 0.03 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | |||||||
| 0.79 ± 0.01 | 1.99 ± 0.05 | ||||||||
| 0.83 ± 0.02 | 1.39 ± 0.02 | ||||||||
| 0.70 ± 0.03 | 1.12 ± 0.05 | ||||||||
v: ultrasound velocities that were measured directly by ultrasonic method; v11, v22, v33, v12/12, v23/2, v13/13 were longitudinal wave speed measured with the generation and sensing transducer in line, and v12, v23, v13 were the transverse wave speed measured with the generation and sensing transducer at a right angle. c: elastic coefficients that were calculated from v. E (Young's modulus), G (Shear modulus), and ν (Poisson's ratio) were calculated from c and would be further applied into the finite element analysis for material definition of the condyle. For subscript numbers of v, E, G, and ν. 1 was in the antero-posterior direction, 2 was in the vertical direction, and 3 was in the mesio-lateral direction, while the subscript numbers of c did not the indicate directions, which were just the calculation results from vij and further for calculating the technical constants.
Figure 3Distribution map of the maximal principal stress (a) and the minimal principal stress (b) in the TMJ with orthotropic properties. The pictures show us that the stress uniformly transferred from the surface to the central part of the orthotropic condyle. Stress of the anterior part of the TMJ was mainly compressive and that of posterior part was mainly tensile (the cartilage could not be seen clearly from this direction). Comparisons of the maximal principle stress and the minimal principle stress in TMJ between the finite element analysis model with an orthotropic condyle and isotropic condyle were marked in (c) and (d), in which black curve corresponded with data based on the orthotropic model and the multicolored curve with data based on the isotropic model. It showed that stress values in the condylar neck (point 1, 2), condyle (points 3–11), and cartilage (points 12–20) of the isotropic model were higher than those of the orthotropic model (with ∗∗ indicating P < .01 and ∗ indicating P < .05), whereas values in the disc of the both models showed no differences (points 20–29).