Literature DB >> 19644005

Characterisation of organisational issues in paediatric clinical ethics consultation: a qualitative study.

D J Opel1, B S Wilfond, D Brownstein, D S Diekema, R A Pearlman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The traditional approach to resolving ethics concerns may not address underlying organisational issues involved in the evolution of these concerns. This represents a missed opportunity to improve quality of care "upstream". The purpose of this study was to understand better which organisational issues may contribute to ethics concerns.
METHODS: Directed content analysis was used to review ethics consultation notes from an academic children's hospital from 1996 to 2006 (N = 71). The analysis utilised 18 categories of organisational issues derived and modified from published quality improvement protocols.
RESULTS: Organisational issues were identified in 68 of the 71 (96%) ethics consult notes across a range of patient settings and reasons for consultation. Thirteen of the 18 categories of organisational issues were identified and there was a median of two organisational issues per consult note. The most frequently identified organisational issues were informal organisational culture (eg, collective practices and approaches to situations with ethical dimensions that are not guided by policy), policies and procedures (eg, staff knows policy and/or procedural guidelines for an ethical concern but do not follow it) and communication (eg, communication about critical information, orders, or hand-offs repeatedly does not occur among services).
CONCLUSIONS: Organisational issues contribute to ethical concerns that result in clinical ethics consults. Identifying and addressing organisational issues such as informal culture and communication may help decrease the recurrence of future similar ethics concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19644005     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.027896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Can UK clinical ethics committees improve quality of care?

Authors:  Leah McClimans; Anne-Marie Slowther; Michael Parker
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-06

2.  Organizational Influences on Health Professionals' Experiences of Moral Distress in PICUs.

Authors:  Sarah Wall; Wendy J Austin; Daniel Garros
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-03

3.  Inclusive consultation: a hermeneutical approach to ethical deliberation in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Andreas Vieth
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2011-12

4.  Institutional challenges for clinical ethics committees.

Authors:  Andrea Dörries; Pierre Boitte; Ana Borovecki; Jean-Philippe Cobbaut; Stella Reiter-Theil; Anne-Marie Slowther
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2011-09

5.  Ethics consultation in pediatrics: long-term experience from a pediatric oncology center.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Christopher L Church; Monika Metzger; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.

Authors:  Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon; Yun Ting Ong; Hong Wei Yap; Kuang Teck Tay; Elijah Gin Lim; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Wei Qiang Lim; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Ying Pin Toh; Min Chiam; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Clinical ethics consultations in psychiatric compared to non-psychiatric medical settings: characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  T Löbbing; S Carvalho Fernando; M Driessen; M Schulz; J Behrens; K K B Kobert
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-01-31

8.  Moral structuring of children during the process of obtaining informed consent in clinical and research settings.

Authors:  Anderson Díaz-Pérez; Elkin Navarro Quiroz; Dilia Esther Aparicio Marenco
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to Critical Incident Reporting Systems.

Authors:  Kai Wehkamp; Eva Kuhn; Rainer Petzina; Alena Buyx; Annette Rogge
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.