BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Odontoid process fractures of the axis are frequent in elderly patients. However, the impact in terms of handicap and morbidity in this particular population are unknown. The role of surgical treatment remains controversial. METHODS: We present a retrospective series of patients aged 70 years or older with odontoid fractures treated in our department between 1998 and 2006. Two cohorts were defined (surgery versus conservative) and compared. Morbidity, handicap, and radiographic fusion were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated. The mean age was 80.67 years. Five patients died early during hospitalization. Fractures were type II in 66.7% of the cases and type III in 33.3%. Orthopedic treatment was chosen in 44.4% of the cases. A non-union at the fracture site was found in 33% of the cases and morbidity in 41.7% of the cases was found after a 1-year follow-up. Surgery was performed in 40.7% of the cases. There was 18% non-union and no morbidity after 1-year of follow-up. Morbidity was statistically lower in the surgery group (p=0.037), particularly in cases of type II fracture (p=0.0063); no statistically significant difference was found for non-union at the fracture site (p=0.64) except for type II fractures (p=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Odontoid fractures in the elderly are a very frequent problem. Immediate mortality is still high but appears correlated to associated lesions. Today's treatments must preserve autonomy for these patients. For elderly patients, the treatment must be chosen in relation to the fracture analysis. In our opinion, surgical management is the treatment of choice for unstable fractures (type II). Conservative management is indicated for stable fractures.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Odontoid process fractures of the axis are frequent in elderly patients. However, the impact in terms of handicap and morbidity in this particular population are unknown. The role of surgical treatment remains controversial. METHODS: We present a retrospective series of patients aged 70 years or older with odontoid fractures treated in our department between 1998 and 2006. Two cohorts were defined (surgery versus conservative) and compared. Morbidity, handicap, and radiographic fusion were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated. The mean age was 80.67 years. Five patients died early during hospitalization. Fractures were type II in 66.7% of the cases and type III in 33.3%. Orthopedic treatment was chosen in 44.4% of the cases. A non-union at the fracture site was found in 33% of the cases and morbidity in 41.7% of the cases was found after a 1-year follow-up. Surgery was performed in 40.7% of the cases. There was 18% non-union and no morbidity after 1-year of follow-up. Morbidity was statistically lower in the surgery group (p=0.037), particularly in cases of type II fracture (p=0.0063); no statistically significant difference was found for non-union at the fracture site (p=0.64) except for type II fractures (p=0.028). CONCLUSIONS:Odontoid fractures in the elderly are a very frequent problem. Immediate mortality is still high but appears correlated to associated lesions. Today's treatments must preserve autonomy for these patients. For elderly patients, the treatment must be chosen in relation to the fracture analysis. In our opinion, surgical management is the treatment of choice for unstable fractures (type II). Conservative management is indicated for stable fractures.
Authors: Maximilian Reinhold; C Bellabarba; R Bransford; J Chapman; W Krengel; M Lee; T Wagner Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.134