Literature DB >> 19642103

Birth weight and mammographic density among postmenopausal women in Sweden.

Rulla M Tamimi1, Louise Eriksson, Pagona Lagiou, Kamila Czene, Anders Ekbom, Chung-Cheng Hsieh, Hans-Olov Adami, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Per Hall.   

Abstract

Birth weight is a significant predictor of breast cancer risk in adult life and mammary gland mass could be an intermediate stage in this long process. We have studied the association of birth size measurements with mammographic density, a marker of mammary gland mass. For a population-based sample of 893 postmenopausal women without previous cancer in Sweden, we retrieved information on birth size from birth records and their most recent mammography. Film mammograms of the medio-lateral oblique view were digitized and the Cumulus software was used for computer-assisted semi-automated thresholding of mammographic density. Results were analyzed using generalized linear models controlling for possible confounders. Mean percent mammographic density increased when comparing the extreme categories of birth weight (from 15.6% to 18.6%) and head circumference (from 15.5% to 20.4%), and the corresponding linear trends were statistically significant (p values 0.02 and 0.007, respectively). The associations were particularly strong when the cutoff for high versus low mammographic density was set at the relatively high value of 50%. Compared to women weighing 3001-3500 grams at birth, women with birth weights >4000g were at almost 3-fold risk of developing high mammographic density (odds ratio: 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 7.9). No association with mammographic density was evident with respect to birth length which, however, is known to be less accurately measured. These results indicate that adult breast density, a powerful predictor of breast cancer risk, has intrauterine roots, as reflected in birth size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19642103     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  15 in total

1.  Perinatal characteristics and breast cancer risk in daughters: a Scandinavian population-based study.

Authors:  R Troisi; T Grotmol; J Jacobsen; S Tretli; H T Sørensen; M Gissler; R Kaaja; N Potischman; A Ekbom; R N Hoover; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Faster ticking rate of the epigenetic clock is associated with faster pubertal development in girls.

Authors:  Alexandra M Binder; Camila Corvalan; Verónica Mericq; Ana Pereira; José Luis Santos; Steve Horvath; John Shepherd; Karin B Michels
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Birth weight and other prenatal factors and risk of breast cancer in Asian-Americans.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Chiu-Chen Tseng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Perinatal factors, female breast cancer, and associated risk factors in Puerto Rico: evidence from the Atabey epidemiology of breast cancer study.

Authors:  Lindsey J Mattick; Cruz M Nazario; Rosa V Rosario-Rosado; Michelle Schelske-Santos; Imar Mansilla-Rivera; Farah A Ramírez-Marrero; Jing Nie; Jo L Freudenheim
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Mammographic density reduction is a prognostic marker of response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Louise Eriksson; Gustaf Edgren; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Genetic variation in the estrogen metabolic pathway and mammographic density as an intermediate phenotype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Keith Humphreys; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindström; David J Hunter; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch; Christopher G Scott; Pagona Lagiou; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Effects of childhood body size on breast cancer tumour characteristics.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Prenatal modulation of breast density and breast stem cells by insulin-like growth factor-1.

Authors:  Chien-I Chang; Hoi Pang Low; Li Qiu; William C Strohsnitter; Chung-Cheng Hsieh
Journal:  Am J Stem Cells       Date:  2012-11-30

9.  Obstetric history and mammographic density: a population-based cross-sectional study in Spain (DDM-Spain).

Authors:  Virginia Lope; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; María Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Maria Soledad Laso; Maria Ederra; Carmen Pedraz-Pingarrón; Isabel González-Román; Milagros García-López; Dolores Salas-Trejo; Mercé Peris; María Pilar Moreno; Jose Antonio Vázquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado; Nuria Aragonés; Marina Pollán
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Giske Ursin; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack; Laura Baglietto; Celine Vachon; Marije F Bakker; Graham G Giles; Kee Seng Chia; Kamila Czene; Louise Eriksson; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Ruth M L Warren; Greg Hislop; Anna M Chiarelli; John L Hopper; Kavitha Krishnan; Jingmei Li; Qing Li; Ian Pagano; Bernard A Rosner; Chia Siong Wong; Christopher Scott; Jennifer Stone; Gertraud Maskarinec; Norman F Boyd; Carla H van Gils; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.