Literature DB >> 19641522

Standardized MRD flow and ASO IGH RQ-PCR for MRD quantification in CLL patients after rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy: a comparative analysis.

S Böttcher1, S Stilgenbauer, R Busch, M Brüggemann, T Raff, C Pott, K Fischer, G Fingerle-Rowson, H Döhner, M Hallek, M Kneba, M Ritgen.   

Abstract

Rituximab-containing regimens are becoming a therapeutic standard in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), so that a validation of flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification (MRD flow) in the presence of this antibody is necessary. We therefore compared results obtained by real-time quantitative (RQ)-PCR to MRD flow in 530 samples from 69 patients randomized to receive chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus rituximab. Quantitative MRD levels assessed by both techniques were closely correlated irrespective of therapy (r=0.95). The sensitivity and specificity of MRD flow was not influenced by the presence of rituximab. With 58.9% positive and 26.4% negative samples by both techniques, 85.3% of assessments (452/530) were qualitatively concordant between MRD flow and RQ-PCR. Discordant samples were typically negative by MRD flow and simultaneously positive close to the detection limit of the PCR assays, indicating a higher sensitivity of PCR for very low MRD levels. However, 93.8% of all samples were concordantly classified by both methods using a threshold of 10(-4) to determine MRD positivity. MRD flow and PCR are equally effective for MRD quantification in rituximab-treated CLL patients within a sensitivity range of up to 10(-4), whereas PCR is more sensitive for detecting MRD below that level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641522     DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  24 in total

1.  High-throughput VDJ sequencing for quantification of minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and immune reconstitution assessment.

Authors:  Aaron C Logan; Hong Gao; Chunlin Wang; Bita Sahaf; Carol D Jones; Eleanor L Marshall; Ismael Buño; Randall Armstrong; Andrew Z Fire; Kenneth I Weinberg; Michael Mindrinos; James L Zehnder; Scott D Boyd; Wenzhong Xiao; Ronald W Davis; David B Miklos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Can prognostic factors be used to direct therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Authors:  Leopold Sellner; Sascha Dietrich; Peter Dreger; Hanno Glimm; Thorsten Zenz
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Risk categories and refractory CLL in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.

Authors:  Thorsten Zenz; John G Gribben; Michael Hallek; Hartmut Döhner; Michael J Keating; Stephan Stilgenbauer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Eliminating minimal residual disease as a therapeutic end point: working toward cure for patients with CLL.

Authors:  Philip A Thompson; William G Wierda
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Allogeneic transplantation in high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a single-center, intent-to-treat analysis.

Authors:  Almuth Hoffmann; Sascha Dietrich; Susanne Hain; Michael Rieger; Ute Hegenbart; Leopold Sellner; Anthony D Ho; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Peter Dreger
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Eradication of bone marrow minimal residual disease may prompt early treatment discontinuation in CLL.

Authors:  Paolo Strati; Michael J Keating; Susan M O'Brien; Jan Burger; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Nitin Jain; Francesco Paolo Tambaro; Zeev Estrov; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Pramoda Challagundla; Stefan H Faderl; William G Wierda
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Obinutuzumab pretreatment abrogates tumor lysis risk while maintaining undetectable MRD for venetoclax + obinutuzumab in CLL.

Authors:  Arnon P Kater; Sabina Kersting; Yvette van Norden; Julie Dubois; Johan A Dobber; Clemens H Mellink; Ludo M Evers; Fransien Croon-de Boer; John Schreurs; Ellen van der Spek; Hein Visser; Cecile Idink; Shulamiet Wittebol; Mels Hoogendoorn; Sanne H Tonino; Mehrdad Mobasher; Mark-David Levin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-12-26

8.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for poor-risk CLL: dissecting immune-modulating strategies for disease eradication and treatment of relapse.

Authors:  M Hahn; S Böttcher; S Dietrich; U Hegenbart; M Rieger; P Stadtherr; A Bondong; R Schulz; M Ritgen; T Schmitt; T H Tran; M Görner; I Herth; T Luft; S Schönland; M Witzens-Harig; T Zenz; M Kneba; A D Ho; P Dreger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction-based analyses of minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Sabrina Uhrmacher; Felix Erdfelder; Karl-Anton Kreuzer
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2010-09-20

Review 10.  Back to the future! The evolving role of maintenance therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher S Hourigan; Philip McCarthy; Marcos de Lima
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.