Literature DB >> 19641363

Choosing the ideal length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent according to body height: study based on a Chinese population.

Chen-Hsun Ho1, Kuo-How Huang, Shyh-Chyan Chen, Yeong-Shiau Pu, Shih-Ping Liu, Hong-Jeng Yu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We conducted this study to determine the ideal stent length according to body height, as data are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 408 patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent insertion (22, 24 or 26 cm) were enrolled. The appropriateness of the stent length was determined according to the plain films and was further compared among patients with different body heights and stent lengths.
RESULTS: In patients <160 cm, the use of a 22-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 24- or 26-cm stent (86.5, 51.9 and 46.4%). In patients between 160 and 175 cm, a 22- or 24-cm stent was significantly more appropriate than a 26-cm stent (79.2, 66.7 and 46.3%), while the difference between the use of a 22- and 24-cm stent was not significant. In patients >175 cm, a 24- or 26-cm stent might be more appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: Body heights can predict the ideal stent length. Based on a Chinese population, a 22-cm stent length is more appropriate for those <175 cm. A longer, 24- or 26-cm stent may be suitable for those >175 cm. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641363     DOI: 10.1159/000224872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  8 in total

1.  Freeze-casting porous chitosan ureteral stents for improved drainage.

Authors:  Kaiyang Yin; Prajan Divakar; Ulrike G K Wegst
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Changing to a loop-type ureteral stent decreases patients' stent-related symptoms.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Takehiko Ogawa; Hiroji Uemura; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-08-17

3.  Is a 22 cm Ureteric Stent Appropriate for Korean Patients Smaller than 175 cm in Height?

Authors:  Byung Ki Lee; Sung Hyun Paick; Hyoung Keun Park; Hyeong Gon Kim; Yong Soo Lho
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-09-17

4.  Ureteral stent retrieval using the crochet hook technique in females.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Hiroki Ito; Hideyuki Terao; Takuya Yamagishi; Takehiko Ogawa; Hiroji Uemura; Yoshinobu Kubota; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Verification of relationships between anthropometric variables among ureteral stents recipients and ureteric lengths: a challenge for Vitruvian-da Vinci theory.

Authors:  Philip A Acelam
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2015-08-13

6.  Developing a preoperative predictive model for ureteral length for ureteral stent insertion.

Authors:  Takashi Kawahara; Kentaro Sakamaki; Hiroki Ito; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Hideyuki Terao; Kazuhide Makiyama; Hiroji Uemura; Masahiro Yao; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents.

Authors:  Makoto Taguchi; Kenji Yoshida; Motohiko Sugi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  A ureteral stent crossing the bladder midline leads to worse urinary symptoms.

Authors:  Makoto Taguchi; Kenji Yoshida; Motohiko Sugi; Tadashi Matsuda; Hidefumi Kinoshita
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-11-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.