Literature DB >> 19641360

Bipolar transurethral resection in saline system versus traditional monopolar resection system in treating large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Qi Chen1, Li Zhang, Yu Jun Liu, Ji Dong Lu, Guo Ming Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We report our prospective clinical result of transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) system in treating large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with BPH (volume >50 ml) were enrolled in the study. An intravenous device was used for serum sodium and hemoglobin tests to monitor the alteration. All acute complications were noted. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months.
RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized into two groups. Follow-up data were compared with baseline. The decline in serum sodium postoperatively was smaller in the TURIS group (6.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 14.8 +/- 1.8 mM, p = 0.001). Hemoglobin only dropped by 1.4 g/dl in the TURIS group, whereas it dropped by 2.5 g/dl in the TURP group (p = 0.001). The TURIS system showed a better resection rate (0.64 vs. 0.52 g/min, p = 0.001). Total acute complication rate was 8 of 19 (42%) in the TURP arm and 4 of 21 (19%) in the TURIS arm. The catheter was removed sooner (2.5 vs. 3.4 days) and hospitalization time was less (3.0 vs. 4.2 days) in the TURIS group. The mean improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum urinary flow rate at 6 months was comparable in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The TURIS system demonstrated superior safety in treating large-volume BPH and had a similar efficacy to TURP in short term. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19641360     DOI: 10.1159/000224869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yin Tang; Jinhong Li; Chuanxiao Pu; YunJin Bai; HaiChao Yuan; Qiang Wei; Ping Han
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.

Authors:  Cameron Edwin Alexander; Malo Mf Scullion; Muhammad Imran Omar; Yuhong Yuan; Charalampos Mamoulakis; James Mo N'Dow; Changhao Chen; Thomas Bl Lam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-03

3.  A Prospective Study of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate Comparing the Efficiency and Safety of the Method in Large and Small Adenomas.

Authors:  Nikolaos Mertziotis; Diomidis Kozyrakis; Christos Kyratsas; Andreas Konandreas
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12-07

4.  Management of large prostatic adenoma: Lasers versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate.

Authors:  Narmada P Gupta; Rishi Nayyar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07

Review 5.  The TURis System for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Authors:  Andrew Cleves; Paul Dimmock; Neil Hewitt; Grace Carolan-Rees
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Operative outcomes and surgeon preferences, a real-world scenario.

Authors:  Vijay Kumar Sarma Madduri; Malay Kumar Bera; Dilip Kumar Pal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.