Literature DB >> 19640873

On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.

Kevin Duff1, Sid E O'Bryant, Holly James Westervelt, Jerry J Sweet, Cecil R Reynolds, Wilfred G van Gorp, Daniel Tranel, Robert J McCaffrey.   

Abstract

The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640873     DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acp031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  1 in total

1.  Mentoring Journal Manuscript Reviewers Using a Competency-Based Approach: The Next Developmental Stage for the Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

Authors:  Ronald H Rozensky; Jerry J Sweet; Steven M Tovian
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2021-06-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.