BACKGROUND: Employment status is an important determinant of health inequalities. Among unemployed people, poor health decreases the likelihood of re-employment. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial with 6 months' follow-up among unemployed people with health complaints receiving social security benefits from the city of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. In total, 456 people were assigned to the control group and 465 people to the intervention group. The intervention consisted of three sessions weekly over 12 weeks. One session a week was focused on education to enhance the ability to cope with (health) problems, and two weekly sessions consisted of physical activities. The primary outcome measures were perceived health, measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey, and psychological measures mastery, self-esteem and pain-related fear of movement. Secondary outcome measures were work values, job search activities and re-employment. RESULTS: Enrolment in the intervention programme was 65%, and 72% completed the programme with over 70% attendance at all sessions. The intervention had a good reach among subjects with lower education, but had no effect on mental and physical health, mastery, self-esteem and pain-related fear of movement. Participation in the programme had no influence on work values, job search activities or re-employment. CONCLUSION: This intervention programme aimed at the promotion of physical and mental health in unemployed people with health complaints did not show beneficial effects. The lack of integration into regular vocational rehabilitation activities may have interfered with these findings. This particular health programme cannot be recommended for implementation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Employment status is an important determinant of health inequalities. Among unemployed people, poor health decreases the likelihood of re-employment. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial with 6 months' follow-up among unemployed people with health complaints receiving social security benefits from the city of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. In total, 456 people were assigned to the control group and 465 people to the intervention group. The intervention consisted of three sessions weekly over 12 weeks. One session a week was focused on education to enhance the ability to cope with (health) problems, and two weekly sessions consisted of physical activities. The primary outcome measures were perceived health, measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey, and psychological measures mastery, self-esteem and pain-related fear of movement. Secondary outcome measures were work values, job search activities and re-employment. RESULTS: Enrolment in the intervention programme was 65%, and 72% completed the programme with over 70% attendance at all sessions. The intervention had a good reach among subjects with lower education, but had no effect on mental and physical health, mastery, self-esteem and pain-related fear of movement. Participation in the programme had no influence on work values, job search activities or re-employment. CONCLUSION: This intervention programme aimed at the promotion of physical and mental health in unemployed people with health complaints did not show beneficial effects. The lack of integration into regular vocational rehabilitation activities may have interfered with these findings. This particular health programme cannot be recommended for implementation.
Authors: Heribert Limm; Mechthild Heinmüller; Katrin Liel; Karin Seeger; Harald Gündel; Ahmet Kimil; Peter Angerer Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Katri Romppainen; Antti Saloniemi; Ulla Kinnunen; Virpi Liukkonen; Pekka Virtanen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Heribert Limm; Mechthild Heinmüller; Harald Gündel; Katrin Liel; Karin Seeger; Ramazan Salman; Peter Angerer Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 3.411