Literature DB >> 19640538

The mechanical properties of cranial bone: the effect of loading rate and cranial sampling position.

Julie A Motherway1, Peter Verschueren, Georges Van der Perre, Jos Vander Sloten, Michael D Gilchrist.   

Abstract

Linear and depressed skull fractures are frequent mechanisms of head injury and are often associated with traumatic brain injury. Accurate knowledge of the fracture of cranial bone can provide insight into the prevention of skull fracture injuries and help aid the design of energy absorbing head protection systems and safety helmets. Cranial bone is a complex material comprising of a three-layered structure: external layers consist of compact, high-density cortical bone and the central layer consists of a low-density, irregularly porous bone structure. In this study, cranial bone specimens were extracted from 8 fresh-frozen cadavers (F=4, M=4; 81+/-11 years old). 63 specimens were obtained from the parietal and frontal cranial bones. Prior to testing, all specimens were scanned using a microCT scanner at a resolution of 56.9 microm. The specimens were tested in a three-point bend set-up at different dynamic speeds (0.5, 1 and 2.5 m/s). The associated mechanical properties that were calculated for each specimen include the 2nd moment of inertia, the sectional elastic modulus, the maximum force at failure, the energy absorbed until failure and the maximum bending stress. Additionally, the morphological parameters of each specimen and their correlation with the resulting mechanical parameters were examined. It was found that testing speed, strain rate, cranial sampling position and intercranial variation all have a significant effect on some or all of the computed mechanical parameters. A modest correlation was also found between percent bone volume and both the elastic modulus and the maximum bending stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640538     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  23 in total

1.  Characterization of porous glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) implant structures: porosity and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Anne Ylä-Soininmäki; Niko Moritz; Lippo V J Lassila; Matti Peltola; Hannu T Aro; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Finite Element Model and Validation of Nasal Tip Deformation.

Authors:  Cyrus T Manuel; Rani Harb; Alan Badran; David Ho; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Superior calvarial bone regeneration using pentenoate-functionalized hyaluronic acid hydrogels with devitalized tendon particles.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Brian T Andrews; Yi Feng; Jinxi Wang; Randolph J Nudo; Erik Van Kampen; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

5.  Effects of tissue processing on bioactivity of cartilage matrix-based hydrogels encapsulating osteoconductive particles.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Taylor A Zabel; Yi Feng; Jinxi Wang; Brian T Andrews; Randolph J Nudo; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.715

6.  Biofabrication of 3D printed hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Yoontae Kim; Eun-Jin Lee; Albert V Davydov; Stanislav Frukhtbeyen; Jonathan E Seppala; Shozo Takagi; Laurence Chow; Stella Alimperti
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.715

7.  The dynamic impact behavior of the human neurocranium.

Authors:  Johann Zwirner; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Joshua Workman; Ashvin Thambyah; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mechanical properties of cranial bones and sutures in 1-2-year-old infants.

Authors:  Jiawen Wang; Donghua Zou; Zhengdong Li; Ping Huang; Dongri Li; Yu Shao; Huijun Wang; Yijiu Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-10-03

9.  Geometric and mechanical evaluation of 3D-printing materials for skull base anatomical education and endoscopic surgery simulation - A first step to create reliable customized simulators.

Authors:  Valentin Favier; Nabil Zemiti; Oscar Caravaca Mora; Gérard Subsol; Guillaume Captier; Renaud Lebrun; Louis Crampette; Michel Mondain; Benjamin Gilles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Beneficial osseointegration effect of hydroxyapatite coating on cranial implant - FEM investigation.

Authors:  Jakub Chamrad; Petr Marcián; Jan Cizek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.