Literature DB >> 19639714

Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme.

Ruth Lopert1.   

Abstract

In Australia, most prescription drugs are subsidized through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), one of several government programs in which evidence-based decision making is applied to the funding of health technologies. PBS processes are intended to ensure "value for money" for the Australian taxpayer and to support affordable, equitable access to prescription medicines; they are not intended as a mechanism for cost containment. The inclusion of a drug on the national formulary depends on the recommendation of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), which considers not only the comparative effectiveness but also the comparative cost-effectiveness of drugs proposed for listing. While some decisions have been controversial, the PBS retains strong public support. Moreover, evidence does not suggest that the consideration of cost-effectiveness has created a negative environment for the drug industry: Australia has a high penetration of patented medicines, with prices for some recently approved drugs at U.S. levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19639714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)        ISSN: 1558-6847


  9 in total

1.  Reading a cost-effectiveness or decision analysis study: Five things to consider.

Authors:  Kate C Young; Adam G Kelly; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Donald J Philippon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Using price-volume agreements to manage pharmaceutical leakage and off-label promotion.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-09-06

4.  Impact of specific Beers Criteria medications on associations between drug exposure and unplanned hospitalisation in elderly patients taking high-risk drugs: a case-time-control study in Western Australia.

Authors:  Sylvie D Price; C D'Arcy J Holman; Frank M Sanfilippo; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Advantages of the dental practice-based research network initiative and its role in dental education.

Authors:  Frederick A Curro; Ashley C Grill; Van P Thompson; Ronald G Craig; Don Vena; Analia V Keenan; Frederick Naftolin
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 6.  Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.

Authors:  Shannon Brownlee; Kalipso Chalkidou; Jenny Doust; Adam G Elshaug; Paul Glasziou; Iona Heath; Somil Nagpal; Vikas Saini; Divya Srivastava; Kelsey Chalmers; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking.

Authors:  Lalla Aïda Guindo; Monika Wagner; Rob Baltussen; Donna Rindress; Janine van Til; Paul Kind; Mireille M Goetghebeur
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2012-07-18

Review 8.  A systematic review of cost-sharing strategies used within publicly-funded drug plans in member countries of the organisation for economic co-operation and development.

Authors:  Lianne Barnieh; Fiona Clement; Anthony Harris; Marja Blom; Cam Donaldson; Scott Klarenbach; Don Husereau; Diane Lorenzetti; Braden Manns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Selection of essential medicines for South Africa - an analysis of in-depth interviews with national essential medicines list committee members.

Authors:  Velisha Ann Perumal-Pillay; Fatima Suleman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.