Literature DB >> 19639007

Response to selection and realized heritability of sperm length in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria).

R Dobler1, D J Hosken.   

Abstract

Sperm length shows considerable phenotypic variation both inter- and intra-specifically, but a general explanation for this variation is lacking. In addition, our understanding of the genetic variation underlying sperm length variation is also limited because there have been few studies on the genetics of sperm size. One factor that could explain the variation in sperm length is that length influences sperm competitiveness, and there is some evidence for this. However, in yellow dung flies (Scathophaga stercoraria), microevolutionary responses to experimental variation at levels of sperm competition indicate that sperm length does not influence sperm competitiveness, although this lack of response may simply indicate sperm length lacks evolutionary potential (that is, it is constrained in some way), in spite of evidence that sperm length is heritable. Here we report on a laboratory study, in which we artificially selected upwards and downwards on sperm length in S. stercoraria. We found that sperm length significantly diverged after four generations of selection, but the response to selection was asymmetrical: upward selection generated a rapid response, but downward did not. We estimated the realized heritability of sperm length to be approximately 50%, which is consistent with previous sire-son estimates. We also assessed the fertility of males from upward and downward lines and found they did not differ. Results are discussed in the context of sperm competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19639007     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  6 in total

1.  Sperm length is not influenced by haploid gene expression in the flies Drosophila melanogaster and Scathophaga stercoraria.

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; Ralph Dobler; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The role of oxidative stress in postcopulatory selection.

Authors:  Christopher R Friesen; Daniel W A Noble; Mats Olsson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Genetic and Genomic Response to Selection for Food Consumption in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Megan E Garlapow; Logan J Everett; Shanshan Zhou; Alexander W Gearhart; Kairsten A Fay; Wen Huang; Tatiana V Morozova; Gunjan H Arya; Lavanya Turlapati; Genevieve St Armour; Yasmeen N Hussain; Sarah E McAdams; Sophia Fochler; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Natural selection increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Masako Katsuki; Manmohan D Sharma; Katsuya Kiyose; Tomokazu Seko; Yasukazu Okada; Alastair J Wilson; David J Hosken
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Genetic Factors Influencing Sperm Competition.

Authors:  Alberto Civetta; José M Ranz
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Heat stress but not inbreeding affects offensive sperm competitiveness in Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  Emile Lieshout; Joseph L Tomkins; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.