Andreas Machens1, Kerstin Lorenz, Henning Dralle. 1. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany. AndreasMachens@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to define the need for lymph node dissection in Rearranged during Transfection (RET) carriers at risk for hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Controversy surrounds the need for lymph node dissection to complement thyroidectomy in RET carriers. METHODS: Integration of molecular, biochemical, histopathologic, and clinical information from 308 RET carriers referred for (re-)operation to a specialist surgical center. RESULTS: The carriers differed significantly in age at thyroidectomy when stratified by histopathology (tumor-free thyroid, node-negative, and node-positive medullary thyroid cancer) and mutated codon (611, 618, 620, 634, 768, 790, 804, 891, and 918). The wide overlap among the 3 histopathologic groups compromised individual predictions based on age alone. There was a significant relationship between the presence of lymph node metastases and increased pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels. All 46 carriers with node-positive medullary thyroid cancer, who harbored 1 to 68 positive nodes, exhibited increased pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels (91.4 pg/mL or higher). Conversely, 74 (44%) of 168 carriers with normal thyroids, C-cell hyperplasia, or node-negative medullary thyroid cancer displayed normal pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels (negative predictive value 100%). Prediction of lymph node metastasis was better in carriers of codon 918 mutations (positive predictive value, PPV, 80%-100%) and those older than 20 years of age (PPV, 50%). DISCUSSION: In the absence of clinical evidence to the contrary, RET carriers with normal pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels may forgo lymph node dissection. The usefulness of calcitonin thresholds to break down the block of carriers with increased calcitonin levels should be explored further.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to define the need for lymph node dissection in Rearranged during Transfection (RET) carriers at risk for hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Controversy surrounds the need for lymph node dissection to complement thyroidectomy in RET carriers. METHODS: Integration of molecular, biochemical, histopathologic, and clinical information from 308 RET carriers referred for (re-)operation to a specialist surgical center. RESULTS: The carriers differed significantly in age at thyroidectomy when stratified by histopathology (tumor-free thyroid, node-negative, and node-positive medullary thyroid cancer) and mutated codon (611, 618, 620, 634, 768, 790, 804, 891, and 918). The wide overlap among the 3 histopathologic groups compromised individual predictions based on age alone. There was a significant relationship between the presence of lymph node metastases and increased pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels. All 46 carriers with node-positive medullary thyroid cancer, who harbored 1 to 68 positive nodes, exhibited increased pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels (91.4 pg/mL or higher). Conversely, 74 (44%) of 168 carriers with normal thyroids, C-cell hyperplasia, or node-negative medullary thyroid cancer displayed normal pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels (negative predictive value 100%). Prediction of lymph node metastasis was better in carriers of codon 918 mutations (positive predictive value, PPV, 80%-100%) and those older than 20 years of age (PPV, 50%). DISCUSSION: In the absence of clinical evidence to the contrary, RET carriers with normal pretherapeutic basal calcitonin levels may forgo lymph node dissection. The usefulness of calcitonin thresholds to break down the block of carriers with increased calcitonin levels should be explored further.
Authors: Thereasa A Rich; Lei Feng; Naifa Busaidy; Gilbert J Cote; Robert F Gagel; Mimi Hu; Camilo Jimenez; Jeffrey E Lee; Nancy Perrier; Steven I Sherman; Steven G Waguespack; Anita Ying; Elizabeth Grubbs Journal: Thyroid Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Lilah F Morris; Steven G Waguespack; Beth S Edeiken-Monroe; Jeff E Lee; Thereasa A Rich; Anita K Ying; Carla L Warneke; Douglas B Evans; Nancy D Perrier; Elizabeth G Grubbs Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Henning Dralle; Thomas J Musholt; Jochen Schabram; Thomas Steinmüller; Andreja Frilling; Dietmar Simon; Peter E Goretzki; Bruno Niederle; Christian Scheuba; Thomas Clerici; Michael Hermann; Jochen Kußmann; Kerstin Lorenz; Christoph Nies; Peter Schabram; Arnold Trupka; Andreas Zielke; Wolfram Karges; Markus Luster; Kurt W Schmid; Dirk Vordermark; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Reinhard Mühlenberg; Otmar Schober; Harald Rimmele; Andreas Machens Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445