Literature DB >> 19638903

Comparison of three micromorphometric pathology classifications of melanoma metastases in the sentinel node.

Iris M C van der Ploeg1, Bin B R Kroon, Ninja Antonini, Renato A Valdés Olmos, Omgo E Nieweg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to determine which classification best predicts additional lymph node disease and survival, and to suggest a threshold below which a completion dissection may be omitted. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Three micromorphometric parameters of melanoma sentinel node metastases were compared: invasion depth from the capsule (Starz-classification), maximum diameter (Rotterdam-criteria), and location within the node (Dewar-classification).
METHODS: The pathology slides of 116 patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes were reviewed. The follow-up data were obtained from the prospectively kept database. The median follow-up duration was 53 months.
RESULTS: Metastases with an invasion depth under 0.3 mm or diameter less than 0.1 mm were not associated with additional involved nodes. Four percent of the patients with metastases with an invasion depth of 0.3 to 1.0 mm had other involved nodes and 3% of the patients with metastases with a diameter of 0.1 to 1.0 mm. Other nodes were involved in 3% of subcapsular metastases, 9% of both subcapsular and parenchymal metastases, and 33% in case of multifocal or extensive disease. The smallest tumor invasion depth and diameter associated with additional involved nodes was 0.4 mm. Only 5-year overall survival in the 3 successive invasion depth categories were statistically significant: 92%, 83%, and 68%. Five-year overall survival was 81% in patients with one involved sentinel node and 60% if there were more.
CONCLUSIONS: Invasion depth and diameter of the metastasis correlate best with the presence of additional nodal disease. Invasion depth best predicts overall survival. It seems justified to refrain from completion dissection in patients with a sentinel node tumor invasion depth up to 0.4 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19638903     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b1735b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

Review 1.  Progression of cutaneous melanoma: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong; Martin C Mihm; George F Murphy; Dave S B Hoon; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Jonathan S Zager; Axel Hauschild; Vernon K Sondak; Valerie Guild; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma: overview of international data.

Authors:  Yoichi Moroi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  SLN melanoma micrometastasis predictivity of nodal status: a long term retrospective study.

Authors:  Emilia Migliano; Barbara Bellei; Flavio Andrea Govoni; Giovanni Paolino; Caterina Catricalà; Stefania Bucher; Pietro Donati
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-01

4.  Lymphatic drainage patterns from melanomas on the shoulder or upper trunk to cervical lymph nodes and implications for the extent of neck dissection.

Authors:  Hidde J Veenstra; W Martin C Klop; Maarten J Speijers; Peter J F M Lohuis; Omgo E Nieweg; Harald J Hoekstra; Alfons J M Balm
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  The sentinel node invasion level (SNIL) as a prognostic parameter in melanoma.

Authors:  Lutz Kretschmer; Christina Mitteldorf; Simin Hellriegel; Andreas Leha; Alexander Fichtner; Philipp Ströbel; Michael P Schön; Felix Bremmer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.842

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.