OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and clinical significance of normal, variant, and anomalous branching patterns of the aortic arch and the central veins on computed tomographic (CT) angiography in adults. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive CT angiograms of the chest in 658 women and 342 men with a median age of 53 years. RESULTS: A total of 65.9% of patients had both normal aortic arch branching patterns and normal venous anatomy. Variants in the aortic arch branching pattern were present in 32.4% and anomalies in 1.5%. Venous anomalies were present in 0.7%. Review of CT reports showed that cardiothoracic radiologists correctly reported the anomaly more frequently than other radiologists (94% vs 20%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas anomalies of the central thoracic vasculature are uncommon, variants in the aortic arch branching pattern are common. An appreciation of the appearance of these entities on CT angiography allows for precise reporting and is useful in preprocedure planning.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and clinical significance of normal, variant, and anomalous branching patterns of the aortic arch and the central veins on computed tomographic (CT) angiography in adults. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive CT angiograms of the chest in 658 women and 342 men with a median age of 53 years. RESULTS: A total of 65.9% of patients had both normal aortic arch branching patterns and normal venous anatomy. Variants in the aortic arch branching pattern were present in 32.4% and anomalies in 1.5%. Venous anomalies were present in 0.7%. Review of CT reports showed that cardiothoracic radiologists correctly reported the anomaly more frequently than other radiologists (94% vs 20%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Whereas anomalies of the central thoracic vasculature are uncommon, variants in the aortic arch branching pattern are common. An appreciation of the appearance of these entities on CT angiography allows for precise reporting and is useful in preprocedure planning.
Authors: Aisling M O'Malley; Walid H El Kininy; Helina Debebe; Azreena B Burukan; Shane W Davy Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Michelle L Bayer; Peter C Frommelt; Francine Blei; Johannes M P J Breur; Maria R Cordisco; Ilona J Frieden; Deborah S Goddard; Kristen E Holland; Alfons L Krol; Mohit Maheshwari; Denise W Metry; Kimberly D Morel; Paula E North; Elena Pope; Joseph T Shieh; James F Southern; Orli Wargon; Dawn H Siegel; Beth A Drolet Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-09-28 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Alex M Meyer; Joseph W Turek; Julia Froud; Levi A Endelman; Nicholas B Cavanaugh; Jose E Torres; Ravi Ashwath Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 1.655