Literature DB >> 19638782

Methodology and outcomes of a family medicine research fellowship.

Peter F Cronholm1, Joseph B Straton, Marjorie A Bowman.   

Abstract

There has not been a strong tradition of training researchers to provide the great amount of new evidence needed for the practice of family medicine. Few models for creating successful family medicine researchers have been presented in the literature. The authors report on the methodology and outcomes of a faculty development research fellowship in the University of Pennsylvania's Department of Family Medicine and Community Health. The fellowship focuses on the two domains-intensive research training and academic career development-and frames them with coursework in a content-appropriate master's degree program and clinical practice in an underserved community. Fifteen fellows have completed the program, which began in 1997. Most fellows' research work has been related to primary care and health disparities. Program completers have been the principal investigators on 39 funded studies and coinvestigators on 24 funded studies. They have, at the time this article was written, described their work in 236 publications, 114 of them peer reviewed. All but one program completer hold academic faculty positions, and 12 practice in underserved areas. In a research-intense institution, the fellowship program successfully trained family physicians to be independent clinical researchers and leaders who have substantially contributed to the national effort to mitigate health disparities through practice and research. The authors suggest that the outcomes strongly support the development of similar training opportunities in family medicine departments in other resource- and research-rich institutions.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19638782     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace6bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  4 in total

1.  Family Medicine Research in the United States From the late 1960s Into the Future.

Authors:  Marjorie A Bowman; Sean C Lucan; Thomas C Rosenthal; Arch G Mainous; Paul A James
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Evaluating postgraduate public health and biomedical training program outcomes: : lost opportunities and renewed interest.

Authors:  Jessica Faupel-Badger; David E Nelson; Stephen Marcus; Aisha Kudura; Elaine Nghiem
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Cross-sectional multicentre study on the cohort of all the French junior lecturers in general practice.

Authors:  Marie Barais; Catherine Laporte; Matthieu Schuers; Olivier Saint-Lary; Paul Frappé; Clarisse Dibao-Dina; David Darmon; Tiphanie Bouchez; Julien Gelly
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Meeting report: 'How do I incorporate research into my family practice?': Reflections on experiences of and solutions for young family doctors.

Authors:  Kenneth Yakubu; Maria C Colon-Gonzalez; Kyle Hoedebecke; Vasiliki Gkarmiri; Nagwa N Hegazy; Olugbemi O Popoola
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2018-04-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.