Literature DB >> 19638766

A universal model of diagnostic reasoning.

Pat Croskerry1.   

Abstract

Clinical judgment is a critical aspect of physician performance in medicine. It is essential in the formulation of a diagnosis and key to the effective and safe management of patients. Yet, the overall diagnostic error rate remains unacceptably high. In more than four decades of research, a variety of approaches have been taken, but a consensus approach toward diagnostic decision making has not emerged. In the last 20 years, important gains have been made in psychological research on human judgment. Dual-process theory has emerged as the predominant approach, positing two systems of decision making, System 1 (heuristic, intuitive) and System 2 (systematic, analytical). The author proposes a schematic model that uses the theory to develop a universal approach toward clinical decision making. Properties of the model explain many of the observed characteristics of physicians' performance. Yet the author cautions that not all medical reasoning and decision making falls neatly into one or the other of the model's systems, even though they provide a basic framework incorporating the recognized diverse approaches. He also emphasizes the complexity of decision making in actual clinical situations and the urgent need for more research to help clinicians gain additional insight and understanding regarding their decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19638766     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  163 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic error and neuro-ophthalmology.

Authors:  Leanne Stunkel; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  A 60-year-old woman with chorea and weight loss.

Authors:  Amanda Vick; Ryan R Kraemer; Jason L Morris; Lisa L Willett; Robert M Centor; Carlos A Estrada; J Martin Rodriguez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  How clinical decisions are made.

Authors:  Louise Bate; Andrew Hutchinson; Jonathan Underhill; Neal Maskrey
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Teaching metacognition in clinical decision-making using a novel mnemonic checklist: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Keng Sheng Chew; Steven J Durning; Jeroen Jg van Merriënboer
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Revalidating Sherlock Holmes for a role in medical education.

Authors:  David Levine
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  A 76-year-old woman with diaphoresis and anxiety.

Authors:  Starr Steinhilber; J Martin Rodriguez; Carlos A Estrada; Ryan R Kraemer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  To act or not to act: responses to electronic health record prompts by family medicine clinicians.

Authors:  Philip Zazove; Michael McKee; Lauren Schleicher; Lee Green; Paul Kileny; Mary Rapai; Elie Mulhem
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Patient safety and diagnostic error: tips for your next shift.

Authors:  Doug Sinclair; Pat Croskerry
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Use of simulated physician handoffs to study cross-cover chart biopsy in the electronic medical record.

Authors:  Logan Kendall; Predrag Klasnja; Justin Iwasaki; Jennifer A Best; Andrew A White; Sahar Khalaj; Chris Amdahl; Katherine Blondon
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

10.  How Primary Care Physicians Integrate Price Information into Clinical Decision-Making.

Authors:  Katherine H Schiavoni; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Wendy Guan; Meredith Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist; Alyna T Chien
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.