Literature DB >> 19638764

Toward meeting the challenge of physician competence assessment: the University of California, San Diego Physician Assessment and Clinical Education (PACE) Program.

William A Norcross1, Thomas R Henzel, Karen Freeman, Jane Milner-Mares, Richard E Hawkins.   

Abstract

Physician competence and performance problems contribute to medical errors and substandard health care quality. Assessment of the clinical competence of practicing physicians, however, is challenging. Although physician competence assessment undoubtedly does take place at the local level (e.g., hospital, medical group), it is difficult to objectively assess a partner, colleague, or friend. Moreover, the methodologies used and the outcomes are necessarily veiled by peer review statutes. Consequently, there is a need for regional or national assessment centers with the knowledge, skill, and experience to perform clinical competence assessments on individual physicians and provide or direct remediation, when appropriate. The University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Physician Assessment and Clinical Education (PACE) Program was founded at the UCSD School of Medicine in 1996 for this purpose. From inception in 1996 through the first quarter of 2009, 867 physicians have participated in the UCSD PACE Program. The PACE Program is divided into two components. Phase I includes two days of multilevel, multimodal testing, and Phase II is a five-day, preceptor-based formative assessment program taking place in the residency program of the physician's specialty. From July 2002 through December 2005, a study of 298 physician participants of the UCSD PACE Program was conducted.The future of the comprehensive assessment of practicing physicians depends on (1) development and standardization of instruments, techniques, and procedures for measuring competence and performance, including in-practice measures, (2) collaborative networking of assessment programs, (3) cost control, and (4) continued development of remedial measures that correspond to assessment findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19638764     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad199c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  4 in total

1.  Cognitive Impairment in Aging Physicians: Current Challenges and Possible Solutions.

Authors:  Gayatri Devi; Darren R Gitelman; Daniel Press; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04

2.  The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes.

Authors:  James M DuBois; John T Chibnall; Raymond Tait; Jillon S Vander Wal
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement.

Authors:  Terry E Hill; Peter F Martelli; Julie H Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing the need for a research ethics remediation program.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Emily E Anderson; John Chibnall
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 4.689

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.