OBJECTIVES: We surveyed the availability of tobacco products and nonprescription nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in pharmacies in New York City, stratified by the race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) of the surrounding neighborhoods to determine whether disparities in availability existed. METHODS: Surveyors visited a random sample of retail pharmacies to record the availability of tobacco products and nonprescription NRT. We used census data and geographic information systems analysis to determine the SES of each neighborhood. We used logistic modeling to explore relations between SES and the availability of NRT and tobacco products. RESULTS: Of 646 pharmacies sampled, 90.8% sold NRT and 46.9% sold cigarettes. NRT and cigarettes were slightly more available in pharmacies in neighborhoods with a higher SES. NRT was more expensive in poorer neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Small disparities existed in access to nonprescription NRT and cigarettes. The model did not adequately account for cigarette access, because of availability from other retail outlets. These results may explain some of the excess prevalence of cigarette use in low-SES areas.
OBJECTIVES: We surveyed the availability of tobacco products and nonprescription nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in pharmacies in New York City, stratified by the race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) of the surrounding neighborhoods to determine whether disparities in availability existed. METHODS: Surveyors visited a random sample of retail pharmacies to record the availability of tobacco products and nonprescription NRT. We used census data and geographic information systems analysis to determine the SES of each neighborhood. We used logistic modeling to explore relations between SES and the availability of NRT and tobacco products. RESULTS: Of 646 pharmacies sampled, 90.8% sold NRT and 46.9% sold cigarettes. NRT and cigarettes were slightly more available in pharmacies in neighborhoods with a higher SES. NRT was more expensive in poorer neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Small disparities existed in access to nonprescription NRT and cigarettes. The model did not adequately account for cigarette access, because of availability from other retail outlets. These results may explain some of the excess prevalence of cigarette use in low-SES areas.
Authors: Vilma E Cokkinides; Michael T Halpern; Elizabeth M Barbeau; Elizabeth Ward; Michael J Thun Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Andrew M Davis; Michael S Taitel; Jenny Jiang; Dima M Qato; Monica E Peek; Chia-Hung Chou; Elbert S Huang Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2016-06-28
Authors: Joseph G L Lee; Lisa Henriksen; Shyanika W Rose; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer S Barber; Elizabeth Ela; Heather Gatny; Yasamin Kusunoki; Souhiela Fakih; Peter Batra; Karen Farris Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2019-02-20
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Jennifer L Pearson; Haijun Xiao; Donna Vallone; Thomas R Kirchner Journal: Addiction Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Sarah E McBane; Robin L Corelli; Christian B Albano; John M Conry; Mark A Della Paolera; Amy K Kennedy; Antoine T Jenkins; Karen Suchanek Hudmon Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 2.047