| Literature DB >> 19638538 |
K S Phiri1, J C J Calis, D Kachala, E Borgstein, J Waluza, I Bates, B Brabin, M Boele van Hensbroek.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone marrow iron microscopy has been the "gold standard" method of assessing iron deficiency. However, the commonly used method of grading marrow iron remains highly subjective. AIM: To improve the bone marrow grading method by developing a detailed protocol that assesses iron in fragments, in macrophages around fragments and in erythroblasts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19638538 PMCID: PMC2709917 DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2009.064451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Pathol ISSN: 0021-9746 Impact factor: 3.411
Histological grading for bone marrow iron status according to Gale et al8
| Grade 0 | None | No visible iron under high power magnification (×1000) |
| Grade 1 | Very slight | Small iron particles just visible in few reticulum cells under high power magnification (×1000) |
| Grade 2 | Slight | Small, sparsely distributed iron particles just visible under low power magnification (×100) |
| Grade 3 | Moderate | Numerous small iron particles present in reticulum cells throughout the marrow fragment (×100) |
| Grade 4 | Moderate heavy | Larger iron particles throughout the fragment with tendency to aggregate into clumps (×100) |
| Grade 5 | Heavy | Dense, large clumps of iron throughout the fragment (×100) |
| Grade 6 | Very heavy | Very large deposits of iron, both intra- and extra-cellular, obscuring cellular detail in the fragment (×100) |
Figure 1Bone marrow fragment showing iron deposits at ×400 magnification (top), and ×1000 magnification showing erythroblasts, iron and malaria pigment within macrophages (bottom).
Classification of iron status using the intensive grading method
| Iron detected in: | Iron status category | ||
| Fragment* | Macrophage† | Erythroblast‡ | |
| Present | Present | Present | Normal |
| Present | Present | ||
| Present | Present | Functional iron deficiency | |
| Present | |||
| Present | Present | Iron stores deficiency | |
| Present | |||
| Present | Functional and iron stores deficiency | ||
*Positive fragment iron: fragment grade ⩾2.
†Positive macrophage iron: iron present in reticular cell.
‡Positive erythroblast iron: iron present in >30% of erythroblasts.
Baseline characteristics of cases and controls
| Characteristic | Cases | Controls |
| Recruited | 381 | 23 |
| Age (years)* | 1.7 (1.1) (371) | 1.8 (0.9) (21) |
| Hb (g/dl)* | 3.6 (0.8) (381) | 9.9 (1.8) (23) |
| Male | 178/381 (46.7%) | 19/22 (86.4%) |
| History of previous transfusion | 57/378 (15.1%) | 0/23 (0%) |
| Wasted† | 53/330 (16.1%) | 3/16 (18.8%) |
| Stunted‡ | 176/331 (53.2%) | 7/17 (41.2%) |
| Malaria§ | 226/380 (59.5%) | 0/23 (0%) |
| HIV¶ | 45/357 (12.6%) | 0/9 (0%) |
| Bacteraemia** | 54/359 (15.0%) | 1/14 (7.1%) |
*Mean (SD) (total no).
†Z-score <−2 weight-for-height.
‡Z-score <−2 height-for-age.
§Presence of Plasmodium falciparum asexual parasites in blood.
¶Positive for two rapid tests according to WHO guidelines. Discordant results and reactive results in children less than 18 month were resolved by PCR.19
**Presence of pathogenic bacteria using an automated BacT/Alert system (BioMerieux, Missouri, USA) and cultured for 5 and 56 days for routine pathogens and mycobacteria, respectively.
Figure 2Flow chart showing the number of children recruited and the number of bone marrow samples finally assessed using both Gale’s and intensive histological grading methods.
Bone marrow iron status category results using the ntensive grading method
| Iron status category | Cases (n = 187) | Controls (n = 13) | OR* (95% CI) | p Value |
| Functional iron deficiency (%) | 39.6 | 46.2 | 0.7 (0.2 to 2.9) | 0.9 |
| Normal iron (%) | 31.0 | 7.7 | 5.4 (0.8 to 234.6) | 0.1 |
| Iron stores deficiency (%) | 21.9 | 38.5 | 0.5 (0.1 to 1.9) | 0.2 |
| Functional and stores deficiency (%) | 7.5 | 7.7 | 1.0 (0.1 to 44.4) | 0.9 |
*OR = [odds in cases]/[odds in controls].
Figure 3Error bar graphs for mean log ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations for the different iron status classes using the intensive grading method.
Mean levels of Log ferritin, sTfR and CRP for iron status categories using Gale’s and Intensive grading methods
| Biochemical tests | Gales’ grading method | Intensive grading method | |||||
| Normal | Iron deficiency | Normal | Functional iron deficiency | Iron stores deficiency | Functional and iron stores deficiency | ||
| Log ferritin (μg/l)* | Mean (SD) [n] | 2.7 (0.5) [89] | 1.8 (0.7) [61] | 2.8 (0.5) [34] | 2.6 (0.6) [44] | 1.9 (0.7) [29] | 2.1 (0.8) |
| 95% CI | 2.6 to 2.8 | 1.6 to 2.0 | 2.6 to 2.96 | 2.4 to 2.8 | 1.7 to 1.2 | 1.6 to 2.7 | |
| sTfR (μg/ml)† | Mean (SD) [n] | 11.8 (10.7) [156] | 22.7 (15.9) [86] | 12.5 (16.2) [56] | 11.4 (6.0) [76] | 21.7 (12.5) [44] | 27.0 (28.3) |
| 95% CI | 10.1 to 13.5 | 19.4 to 26.1 | 8.1 to 17.0 | 10.0 to 12.7 | 18.0 to 25.4 | 12.2 to 41.9 | |
| CRP (mg/ml)‡ | Mean (SD) [n] | 122.0 (6.7) [156] | 71.9 (8.5) [86] | 99.8 (70.1) [56] | 126.7 (85.6) [77] | 71.9 (74.7) [45] | 68.9 (64.9) |
| 95% CI | 108.7 to 135.2 | 55.2 to 88.7 | 81.5 to 118.2 | 107.6 to 145.8 | 50.0 to 93.7 | 33.6 to 104.2 | |
*Normal >30 μg/l.
†Normal <8.3 μg/ml.
‡Normal <10 mg/ml.
sTfR, soluble transferrin receptor; CRP, C-reactive protein.