BACKGROUND: The prognosis for recurrent/progressive Ewing sarcoma (ES) remains poor. Pre-clinical, adult phase I and II trials have demonstrated the combination of irinotecan and temozolomide to have schedule-dependent synergy and significant antitumor activity. A pediatric phase I trial has shown this regimen to be safe and active in advanced ES. PROCEDURE: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients with recurrent/progressive ES treated with irinotecan [20 mg/m(2)/day x 5(x2)] and temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/day x 5) in our institution. The best response achieved, time to progression (TTP), and associated toxicities were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty patients received a total of 154 cycles of therapy. Of 19 evaluable patients, there were 5 complete and 7 partial responses (a 63% overall objective response). Median TTP for 20 evaluable patients with recurrent/progressive ES was 8.3 months; for the subset of 14 patients with recurrent ES, it was 16.2 months. Median TTP was better for patients who sustained a 2-year first remission than for those who relapsed < 24 months from diagnosis and for patients with primary localized vs. metastatic disease. Significant toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea (7 cycles), grade 3 colitis (1 cycle), grade 3 pneumonitis in one patient receiving concurrent whole-lung RT, grade 3-4 neutropenia (19 cycles), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (16 cycles). CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan and temozolomide is a well-tolerated and active regimen for recurrent/progressive ES. Prospective trials are necessary to define the role of this regimen in newly diagnosed ES.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis for recurrent/progressive Ewing sarcoma (ES) remains poor. Pre-clinical, adult phase I and II trials have demonstrated the combination of irinotecan and temozolomide to have schedule-dependent synergy and significant antitumor activity. A pediatric phase I trial has shown this regimen to be safe and active in advanced ES. PROCEDURE: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients with recurrent/progressive ES treated with irinotecan [20 mg/m(2)/day x 5(x2)] and temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/day x 5) in our institution. The best response achieved, time to progression (TTP), and associated toxicities were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty patients received a total of 154 cycles of therapy. Of 19 evaluable patients, there were 5 complete and 7 partial responses (a 63% overall objective response). Median TTP for 20 evaluable patients with recurrent/progressive ES was 8.3 months; for the subset of 14 patients with recurrent ES, it was 16.2 months. Median TTP was better for patients who sustained a 2-year first remission than for those who relapsed < 24 months from diagnosis and for patients with primary localized vs. metastatic disease. Significant toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea (7 cycles), grade 3 colitis (1 cycle), grade 3 pneumonitis in one patient receiving concurrent whole-lung RT, grade 3-4 neutropenia (19 cycles), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (16 cycles). CONCLUSIONS:Irinotecan and temozolomide is a well-tolerated and active regimen for recurrent/progressive ES. Prospective trials are necessary to define the role of this regimen in newly diagnosed ES.
Authors: Elizabeth Stewart; Ross Goshorn; Cori Bradley; Lyra M Griffiths; Claudia Benavente; Nathaniel R Twarog; Gregory M Miller; William Caufield; Burgess B Freeman; Armita Bahrami; Alberto Pappo; Jianrong Wu; Amos Loh; Åsa Karlström; Chris Calabrese; Brittney Gordon; Lyudmila Tsurkan; M Jason Hatfield; Philip M Potter; Scott E Snyder; Suresh Thiagarajan; Abbas Shirinifard; Andras Sablauer; Anang A Shelat; Michael A Dyer Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: R C Brennan; W Furman; S Mao; J Wu; D C Turner; C F Stewart; V Santana; L M McGregor Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Michele Dowless; Caitlin D Lowery; Terry Shackleford; Matthew Renschler; Jennifer Stephens; Robert Flack; Wayne Blosser; Simone Gupta; Julie Stewart; Yue Webster; Jack Dempsey; Alle B VanWye; Philip Ebert; Philip Iversen; Jonathan B Olsen; Xueqian Gong; Sean Buchanan; Peter Houghton; Louis Stancato Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maurizio Ghisoli; Minal Barve; Robert Mennel; Carl Lenarsky; Staci Horvath; Gladice Wallraven; Beena O Pappen; Sam Whiting; Donald Rao; Neil Senzer; John Nemunaitis Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Richard Gorlick; Katherine Janeway; Stephen Lessnick; R Lor Randall; Neyssa Marina Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Darren Hargrave; Birgit Geoerger; Didier Frappaz; Torsten Pietsch; Lyle Gesner; Laura Cisar; Aurora Breazna; Andrew Dorman; Ofelia Cruz-Martinez; Jose Luis Fuster; Xavier Rialland; Céline Icher; Pierre Leblond; David Ashley; Giorgio Perilongo; Martin Elliott; Martin English; Niels Clausen; Jacques Grill Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 4.130