Literature DB >> 19636298

Upstream engagement and the governance of science. The shadow of the genetically modified crops experience in Europe.

Joyce Tait1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19636298      PMCID: PMC2725995          DOI: 10.1038/embor.2009.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Going public.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science--hitting the notes, but missing the music?

Authors:  Brian Wynne
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2006

3.  Off the rails.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Deserting the hungry?

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Science and democracy.

Authors:  Chris Toumey
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 39.213

6.  We cannot live by scepticism alone.

Authors:  Harry Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The rock 'n' roll of knowledge co-production. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Peter Stegmaier
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Off the rails or on the mark?

Authors:  Joanna Chataway; Joyce Tait; David Wield
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Adaptive governance of synthetic biology.

Authors:  Joyce Tait
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  The public option. A possible change in US regulatory protocol for genetically modified organisms: compromised or enhanced objectivity?

Authors:  Jennifer Kuzma; Zahra Meghani
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Global food security and the governance of modern biotechnologies.

Authors:  Joyce Tait; Guy Barker
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  The problem of regulating sophisticated materials.

Authors:  Andrew Maynard; Diana Bowman; Graeme Hodge
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Who or what is 'the public'?

Authors:  Fern Wickson; Ana Delgado; Kamilla Lein Kjølberg
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 39.213

7.  Mismatches between 'scientific' and 'non-scientific' ways of knowing and their contributions to public understanding of science.

Authors:  Anna Mikulak
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Precaution or Integrated Responsibility Approach to Nanovaccines in Fish Farming? A Critical Appraisal of the UNESCO Precautionary Principle.

Authors:  Anne Ingeborg Myhr; Bjørn K Myskja
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 0.917

9.  Opening up the politics of knowledge and power in bioscience.

Authors:  Andy Stirling
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The Bio:Fiction film festival: Sensing how a debate about synthetic biology might evolve.

Authors:  Markus Schmidt; Angela Meyer; Amelie Cserer
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2013-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.