Literature DB >> 19635526

Postural responses explored through classical conditioning.

A D Campbell1, C J Dakin, M G Carpenter.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine whether the central nervous system (CNS) requires the sensory feedback generated by balance perturbations in order to trigger postural responses (PRs). In Experiment 1, twenty-one participants experienced toes-up support-surface tilts in two blocks. Control blocks involved unexpected balance perturbations whereas an auditory tone cued the onset of balance perturbations in Conditioning blocks. A single Cue-Only trial followed each block (Cue-Only(Control) and Cue-Only(Conditioning) trials) in the absence of balance perturbations. Cue-Only(Conditioning) trials were used to determine whether postural perturbations were required in order to trigger PRs. Counter-balancing the order of Control and Conditioning blocks allowed Cue-Only(Control) trials to examine both the audio-spinal/acoustic startle effects of the auditory cue and the carryover effects of the initial conditioning procedure. In Experiment 2, six participants first experienced five consecutive Tone-Only trials that were followed by twenty-five conditioning trials. After conditioning, five Tone-Only trials were again presented consecutively to first elicit and then extinguish the conditioned PRs. Surface electromyography (EMG) recorded muscle activity in soleus (SOL), tibialis anterior (TA) and rectus femoris (RF). EMG onset latencies and amplitudes were calculated together with the onset latency, peak and time-to-peak of shank angular accelerations. Results indicated that an auditory cue could be conditioned to initiate PRs in multiple muscles without balance-relevant sensory triggers generated by balance perturbations. Postural synergies involving excitation of TA and RF and inhibition of SOL were observed following the Cue-Only(Conditioning) trials that resulted in shank angular accelerations in the direction required to counter the expected toes-up tilt. Postural synergies were triggered in response to the auditory cue even 15 min post-conditioning. Furthermore, conditioned PRs were quickly extinguished as participants became unresponsive by the third trial in extinction. In conclusion, our results reveal that the CNS does not require sensory feedback from postural perturbations in order to trigger PRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19635526     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

1.  Increased human stretch reflex dynamic sensitivity with height-induced postural threat.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Martin Zaback; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  'Priming' the brain to generate rapid upper-limb reactions.

Authors:  Bimal Lakhani; Veronica Miyasike-Dasilva; Albert H Vette; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A Model of Predictive Postural Control Against Floor Tilting in Rats.

Authors:  Akira Konosu; Tetsuro Funato; Yuma Matsuki; Akihiro Fujita; Ryutaro Sakai; Dai Yanagihara
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Older adults can rely on an auditory cue to generate anticipatory postural adjustments prior to an external perturbation.

Authors:  Huaqing Liang; Tippawan Kaewmanee; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Neuromuscular Control Modelling of Human Perturbed Posture Through Piecewise Affine Autoregressive With Exogenous Input Models.

Authors:  Andrea Tigrini; Federica Verdini; Marco Maiolatesi; Andrea Monteriù; Francesco Ferracuti; Sandro Fioretti; Sauro Longhi; Alessandro Mengarelli
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  Inhibitory Control and Fall Prevention: Why Stopping Matters.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; James K Richardson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.