Literature DB >> 19634975

How power influences moral thinking.

Joris Lammers1, Diederik A Stapel.   

Abstract

The authors conducted 5 studies to test the idea that both thinking about and having power affects the way in which people resolve moral dilemmas. It is shown that high power increases the use of rule-based (deontological) moral thinking styles, whereas low power increases reliance on outcome-based (consequentialist) moral thinking. Stated differently, in determining whether an act is right or wrong, the powerful focus on whether rules and principles are violated, whereas the powerless focus on the consequences. For this reason, the powerful are also more inclined to stick to the rules, irrespective of whether this has positive or negative effects, whereas the powerless are more inclined to make exceptions. The first 3 experiments show that thinking about power increases rule-based thinking and decreases outcome-based thinking in participants' moral decision making. A 4th experiment shows the mediating role of moral orientation in the effect of power on moral decisions. The 5th experiment demonstrates the role of self-interest by showing that the power-moral link is reversed when rule-based decisions threaten participants' own self-interests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19634975     DOI: 10.1037/a0015437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Apostolic faith church organization contexts for health and wellbeing in women and children.

Authors:  Elias Mpofu; Tinashe Moira Dune; Denise Dion Hallfors; John Mapfumo; Magen Mhaka Mutepfa; James January
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Bad to the bone: facial structure predicts unethical behaviour.

Authors:  Michael P Haselhuhn; Elaine M Wong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The Effects of Social Class on Individuals' Decision-Making Tendencies in a Prestige-Money Game: Social Value or Instrumental Value?

Authors:  Pei Wang; Cheng-Hao Tang
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2019-12

4.  Moral hypocrisy on the basis of construal level: to be a utilitarian personal decision maker or to be a moral advisor?

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Qing Wu; Qun Yang; Liang Zhou; Yuan Jiang; Jiaxi Zhang; Danmin Miao; Jiaxi Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Power and Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Geir Overskeid
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-31

6.  Job-Related and Nonjob-Related Gossips Among Low-Ranked Employees in Unionized Service Organization.

Authors:  Mohsin Bashir; Rizwan Shabbir; Sharjeel Saleem; Muhammad Abrar; Shahnawaz Saqib; Shahzad Habib Gill
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-11

7.  Morality in the flesh: on the link between bodily self-consciousness, moral identity and (dis)honest behaviour.

Authors:  Marina Scattolin; Maria Serena Panasiti; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.653

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.