Literature DB >> 19634832

Closed manipulation after total knee arthroplasty: outcome and affecting variables.

Hal E Cates1, John M Schmidt.   

Abstract

Clinic records of 37 manipulations in 767 consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were analyzed to identify any predictors of manipulation outcome. Factors studied were sex, age, body mass index, tibiofemoral alignment, surgical history, smoking history, range of motion before TKA and manipulation, intraoperative lateral release, implant design and manufacturer, and manipulation interval. Measures of outcome were gains in extension and flexion from manipulation and range of motion at 1-year follow-up. Patients gained an average of 4 degrees of extension and 22 degrees of flexion after manipulation, resulting in average extension of 1 degree and average flexion of 105 degrees at 1-year follow-up. Restored flexion was similar to that measured preoperatively. Manipulation was most effective in patients manipulated within 8 weeks, with full extension and <90 degrees of flexion prior to manipulation, and those receiving a lateral release during arthroplasty. Potential for benefit from manipulation appears to be reduced in patients with large flexion contractures but with adequate flexion. Patients with flexion contractures regained only approximately 80% of the extension they lacked before manipulation. Only 12 of 18 patients (67%) with flexion contractures regained full extension. Manipulation is successful at regaining flexion and restoring function for patients of all levels of flexion deficiency. At least 90 degrees of flexion was regained in 20 of 23 patients (87%) who lacked it at manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19634832     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090511-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

Review 1.  Smoking and outcomes after knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  How often is functional range of motion obtained by manipulation for stiff total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; John Siliski; Henrik Malchau; Andrew Freiberg; Harry Rubash; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 145 patients.

Authors:  Julius Sala; Antti Jaroma; Reijo Sund; Jukka Huopio; Heikki Kröger; Joonas Sirola
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.925

4.  Manipulation for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: when and how often to do it?

Authors:  Aravind S Desai; Anand Karmegam; Asterios Dramis; Tim N Board; Videsh Raut
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-11

5.  Prognostic factors that predict failure of manipulation under anesthesia for the stiff total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alex Gu; Adam J Michalak; Jordan S Cohen; Jeffrey G Stepan; Neil D Almeida; Alexander S McLawhorn; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-16

6.  Manipulation Under Anesthesia With Lysis of Adhesions Is Effective in Arthrofibrosis After Sulcus-Deepening Trochleoplasty: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  S Evan Carstensen; Scott M Feeley; David R Diduch
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-08-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.