Literature DB >> 19634386

Assessing capacity and obtaining consent for thrombolysis for acute stroke.

Jonathan Akinsanya1, Paul Diggory, Elizabeth Heitz, Valerie Jones.   

Abstract

When offering treatment to a patient with capacity they should be informed of the risks and benefits of therapy and consent should be obtained. For patients without capacity, treatment is given in their 'best interests'. Achieving and assessing capacity to consent for treatment in the presence of acute illness can be difficult and especially so in patients suffering with acute stroke. This article presents patients' and doctors' perspectives on assessing capacity to consent to thrombolytic therapy for stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19634386      PMCID: PMC4953610          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-3-239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  3 in total

1.  Controversy and consent: achieving patient autonomy in thrombolysis for acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Sarah Rachel Pywell; Christopher Daniel Smith; Piero Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-30

2.  Regenerative medicine: Stroke survivor and carer views and motivations towards a proposed stem cell clinical trial using placebo neurosurgery.

Authors:  Nicola A Cunningham; Purva Abhyankar; Julie Cowie; Jayne Galinsky; Karen Methven
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3).

Authors:  Richard I Lindley; Ingrid Kane; Geoff Cohen; Peter Ag Sandercock
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 6.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.