Literature DB >> 19634218

Comparison of tooth- and bone-borne devices in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion by three-dimensional computed tomography monitoring: transverse dental and skeletal maxillary expansion, segmental inclination, dental tipping, and vestibular bone resorption.

Constantin Alexander Landes1, Katharina Laudemann, Florian Schübel, Oksana Petruchin, Martin Mack, Stefan Kopp, Robert Alexander Sader.   

Abstract

Comparison of bone-borne (BB) versus tooth-borne (TB) distraction in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion, secondary variables were bipartite (2S) or tripartite (3S) osteotomy, pterygomaxillary osteotomy (+PP) or not (jPP), and age (920 years old [920] and G20 years old [G20]). Fifty patients received three-dimensional computed tomography examination preoperatively and after expansion; 24 had BB, and 26 had TB distraction. Predefined preoperative landmarks versus postexpansion positions were assessed in multiplanar viewing. Bone-borne devices had bigger overall skeletal and dental maxillary expansion declining from anterior to posterior, more asymmetric expansion, less vestibular bone resorption, and less dental tipping; TB devices showed similar dorsal decrease in transverse skeletal and dental maxillary expansion from anterior to posterior, more vestibular bone resorption, particularly in the premolars, and more dental tipping. Bone-borne 3S +PP G20 had the biggest decrease in transverse skeletal widening and biggest segmental outward inclination; BB 3S +PP 920 had the biggest decline in transverse dental widening; TB 2S YPP G20 had the biggest segmental inward inclination; BB 2S YPP 920 had the biggest dental tipping; BB 2S G20 had the biggest vestibular bone resorption in molars; and TB 3S 920 and BB YPP had the biggest vestibular bone resorption in premolars. There was a significant correlation between transverse widening and segmental inclination; that is, a bigger amount of transverse widening provokes less segmental inclination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19634218     DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3181abb430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  12 in total

1.  Periodontal clinical evaluation before and after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Michelle Sendyk; Wilson Roberto Sendyk; Débora Pallos; Letícia Cristina Cidreira Boaro; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino Neto
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018-01

2.  Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue changes in the orofacial region after tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Rania M Nada; Bram van Loon; Thomas J J Maal; Stefaan J Bergé; Yehya A Mostafa; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Jan G J H Schols
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Expansion patterns in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion : Transpalatal distractor versus hyrax appliance.

Authors:  Felix Kunz; Christian Linz; Gregor Baunach; Hartmut Böhm; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Short-term and long-term stability of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion revisited.

Authors:  Sylvain Chamberland; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Evaluation of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with or without pterygomaxillary disjunction based upon preoperative and post-expansion 3D computed tomography data.

Authors:  Katharina Laudemann; Oksana Petruchin; Martin G Mack; Stefan Kopp; Robert Sader; Constantin A Landes
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-09

6.  Ultrasonography in the evaluation of the mid-palatal suture in rapid palatal expansion.

Authors:  I Gumussoy; O Miloglu; I S Bayrakdar; S Dagistan; F Caglayan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Long-term 3D cast model study: bone-borne vs. tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion due to secondary variables.

Authors:  Katharina Laudemann; Oksana Petruchin; Michael Nafzger; Alexander Ballon; Stefan Kopp; Robert A Sader; Constantin A Landes
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-06

Review 8.  Transverse Expansion and Stability after Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomy versus Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Tue Lindberg Blæhr
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-12-28

9.  Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion using customized bone-borne devices.

Authors:  Arturo Bilbao; Juan-Carlos Pérez-Varela; Daniel Pérez-López; Pablo Varela-Centelles
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-07-01

10.  Transpalatal distraction for the management of maxillary constriction in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Nicolai Adolphs; Nicole Ernst; Bodo Hoffmeister; Jan-Dirk Raguse
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.