Literature DB >> 19634108

20-25% lower concentrations of total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after calibration of PSA assays to the WHO reference materials--analysis of 1098 patients in four centers.

Carsten Stephan1, Chris Bangma, Giulio Vignati, Georg Bartsch, Michael Lein, Klaus Jung, Marianne Philippe, Axel Semjonow, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine the potential clinical implications of the recalibration of total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard materials.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 1098 patients with or without clinically detected prostate cancer (PCa) from four independent cohort studies were compared using commercial assays calibrated to the traditional Hybritech PSA (PSA-Hyb) and fPSA (fPSA-Hyb) standards and to the WHO 96/670 (PSA-WHO) and 96/668 (fPSA-WHO) standards. The Access Immunoassay System (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) was used in all studies.
RESULTS: All studies showed 20% to 25% lower PSA and fPSA test results with the WHO-standardized assays. No significant change in %fPSA (fPSA/PSA x 100) was observed. Continuing to use the traditional clinical PSA cutoffs obtained with the Hybritech standard after changing to the PSA-WHO standard could result in up to one-third of prostate cancer cases being missed.
CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturers should fully inform laboratories about a calibration change and its clinical impact. Laboratory reports for PSA measurements should indicate the assay's manufacturer and which calibration standard was used to avoid misleading information concerning PCa risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19634108     DOI: 10.5301/jbm.2009.1349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   2.659


  5 in total

Review 1.  Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Semjonow; Hans Lilja; Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Comparison of Three Assays for Total and Free PSA Using Hybritech and WHO Calibrations.

Authors:  Manuel M Garrido; José C Marta; Ruy M Ribeiro; Luís C Pinheiro; Stefan Holdenrieder; João T Guimarães
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Molecular Form Differences Between Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Standards Create Quantitative Discordances in PSA ELISA Measurements.

Authors:  Erica L McJimpsey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening and New Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer (PCa).

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Harry Rittenhouse; Xinhai Hu; Henning Cammann; Klaus Jung
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-04-28

5.  The prostate health index PHI predicts oncological outcome and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy - analysis in 437 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Maxeiner; Ergin Kilic; Julia Matalon; Frank Friedersdorff; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan; Jonas Busch
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.