Literature DB >> 19633274

Did youth smoking behaviors change before and after the shutdown of Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative?

Nina L Alesci1, Jean L Forster, Darin J Erickson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: No previous studies document the effects of both comprehensive tobacco control and its defunding on youth smoking. This study tests the effect of the youth-focused Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative (MYTPI) and its shutdown on youth smoking and determines whether these effects differed by age.
METHODS: The Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort is a population-based, observational study designed to evaluate the MYTPI. The sample included cohorts of youth aged 12-16 years at baseline in Minnesota (N = 3,636) and a comparison group in six other Midwestern states (n = 605). Biannual surveys assessed youth smoking from October 2000, 5 months after the MYTPI launch, through October 2005, 2 years postshutdown. Adjusted piecewise linear trajectories predicted smoking stage (measured on a 1-6 continuum) comparing Minnesota with a comparison group during the MYTPI (Slope 1) and postshutdown (Slope 2) for each baseline age cohort. Analysis then compared baseline age cohorts with each other by centering their intercepts on age 16.
RESULTS: Neither slope of smoking stage differed between Minnesota and comparison groups, showing no period effects for the MYTPI or shutdown. However, younger cohorts, with early teen experience of MYTPI, smoked less than older cohorts by the same age. Mean smoking stage at age 16 differed by almost a half stage from the youngest (2.04) to the oldest (2.46) age cohort. DISCUSSION: The study offers no evidence of period effects for the MYTPI or its shutdown. Design limitations, national or continued post-MYTPI statewide tobacco control efforts, or program flaws could explain the findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633274      PMCID: PMC2746837          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  21 in total

Review 1.  Stages in the development of adolescent smoking.

Authors:  K P Mayhew; B R Flay; J A Mott
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  D P Hopkins; P A Briss; C J Ricard; C G Husten; V G Carande-Kulis; J E Fielding; M O Alao; J W McKenna; D J Sharp; J R Harris; T A Woollery; K W Harris
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: population based trend analysis.

Authors:  L Biener; J E Harris; W Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

4.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.

Authors:  Roderick P McDonald; Moon-Ho Ringo Ho
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

Review 5.  The effectiveness of state-level tobacco control interventions: a review of program implementation and behavioral outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Siegel
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

Authors:  Joseph L Schafer; John W Graham
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-06

7.  Decreased youth tobacco use in Massachusetts 1996 to 1999: evidence of tobacco control effectiveness.

Authors:  Stephen Soldz; T W Clark; E Stewart; C Celebucki; D Klein Walker
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease.

Authors:  C M Fichtenberg; S A Glantz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000.

Authors:  U E Bauer; T M Johnson; R S Hopkins; R G Brooks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Smoking patterns in Oregon youth: effects of funding and defunding of a comprehensive state tobacco control program.

Authors:  Barbara A Pizacani; Clyde W Dent; Julie E Maher; Kristen Rohde; Michael J Stark; Anthony Biglan; Jill Thompson
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of public policies in reducing smoking: the Minnesota SimSmoke tobacco policy model.

Authors:  David T Levy; Raymond G Boyle; David B Abrams
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.043

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.