Literature DB >> 19633121

Macrolide resistance in microorganisms at antimicrobial-free Swine farms.

Zhi Zhou1, Lutgarde Raskin, Julie L Zilles.   

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between agricultural antimicrobial use and resistance, a variety of methods for quantification of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS(B)) resistance were applied to organic swine farm manure samples. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to indirectly quantify the specific rRNA methylation resulting in MLS(B) resistance. Using this method, an unexpectedly high prevalence of ribosomal methylation and, hence, predicted MLS(B) resistance was observed in manure samples from two swine finisher farms that reported no antimicrobial use (37.6% +/- 6.3% and 40.5% +/- 5.4%, respectively). A culture-based method targeting relatively abundant clostridia showed a lower but still unexpectedly high prevalence of resistance at both farms (27.7% +/- 11.3% and 11.7% +/- 8.6%, respectively), while the prevalence of resistance in cultured fecal streptococci was low at both farms (4.0%). These differences in the prevalence of resistance across microorganisms suggest the need for caution when extrapolating from data obtained with indicator organisms. A third antimicrobial-free swine farm, a breeder-to-finisher operation, had low levels of MLS(B) resistance in manure samples with all methods used (<9%). Tetracycline antimicrobials were detected in manure samples from one of the finisher farms and may provide a partial explanation for the high level of MLS(B) resistance. Taken together, these findings highlight the need for a more fundamental understanding of the relationship between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19633121      PMCID: PMC2747868          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00977-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  32 in total

Review 1.  Macrolide resistance conferred by base substitutions in 23S rRNA.

Authors:  B Vester; S Douthwaite
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set.

Authors:  H Daims; A Brühl; R Amann; K H Schleifer; M Wagner
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Antibiotic resistance of gram-negative enteric bacteria from pigs in three herds with different histories of antibiotic exposure.

Authors:  G Gellin; B E Langlois; K A Dawson; D K Aaron
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Characterization of glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus faecium (GRE) from broilers and pigs in Denmark: genetic evidence that persistence of GRE in pig herds is associated with coselection by resistance to macrolides.

Authors:  F M Aarestrup
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Bacterial populations colonizing and degrading rice straw in anoxic paddy soil.

Authors:  S Weber; S Stubner; R Conrad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Analysis of oxytetracycline, tetracycline, and chlortetracycline in water using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J Zhu; D D Snow; D A Cassada; S J Monson; R F Spalding
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  Rapid and specific detection of Helicobacter pylori macrolide resistance in gastric tissue by fluorescent in situ hybridisation.

Authors:  K Trebesius; K Panthel; S Strobel; K Vogt; G Faller; T Kirchner; M Kist; J Heesemann; R Haas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Isolation, characterization and comparison of bacteria from swine faeces and manure storage pits.

Authors:  Michael A Cotta; Terence R Whitehead; Rhonda L Zeltwanger
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from swine and wild small mammals in the proximity of swine farms and in natural environments in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Gosia K Kozak; Patrick Boerlin; Nicol Janecko; Richard J Reid-Smith; Claire Jardine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  2 in total

1.  Frequency of antibiotic resistance in a swine facility 2.5 years after a ban on antibiotics.

Authors:  Sepideh Pakpour; Suha Jabaji; Martin R Chénier
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Effects of Swine manure on macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B antimicrobial resistance in soils.

Authors:  Zhi Zhou; Lutgarde Raskin; Julie L Zilles
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.