Literature DB >> 19632879

Comparison of changes in abdominal muscle thickness between standing and crook lying during active abdominal hollowing using ultrasound imaging.

Rosie Mew1.   

Abstract

To determine if transversus abdominis (TrA) demonstrates a greater increase in thickness on lower abdominal hollowing (LAH) in standing compared to crook lying. Muscle thickness measurements of TrA, addition of internal obliques (IO) and external obliques (EO) were measured using ultrasound imaging at rest and during LAH on 28 healthy controls (14 female, 14 male) in crook lying and standing. TrA demonstrated greater thickness changes on LAH in standing (+0.88 mm+/-0.12 mm). IO and EO demonstrated greater thickness changes on LAH in crook lying (+0.59 mm+/-0.08 mm and -0.87 mm+/-0.12 mm, respectively). These differences were all significant (p<0.001). Increased resting thickness was noted in standing in TrA (20.7%), IO (10.3%) and EO (1.2%). This increase was only significantly different between TrA and EO (P=0.004). TrA showed significantly greater increases in thickness on LAH in standing compared to crook lying, and with greater specificity in relation to IO and maybe EO. If muscle thickness can be an indicator of muscle function or activity, then this suggests that TrA rehabilitation should be facilitated in positions of greater function, such as standing.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19632879     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2009.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  11 in total

1.  The Effect of Additional External Resistance on Inter-Set Changes in Abdominal Muscle Thickness during Bridging Exercise.

Authors:  Kostantinos Dafkou; Eleftherios Kellis; Athanasios Ellinoudis; Chrysostomos Sahinis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?

Authors:  N Pulkovski; A F Mannion; F Caporaso; V Toma; D Gubler; D Helbling; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of contraction rates of abdominal muscles of chronic low back pain patients in different postures.

Authors:  Sung-Hak Cho; Kang Hoon Kim; Il-Hun Baek; Bong-Oh Goo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-09-20

4.  What is a Suitable Pressure for the Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver in the Supine Position Using a Pressure Biofeedback Unit?

Authors:  Du-Jin Park; Su-Kyoung Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-06-29

5.  The effects of bridge exercise with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver on an unstable surface on the abdominal muscle thickness of healthy adults.

Authors:  Misuk Cho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-01-09

6.  Comparison of abdominal muscle activity during abdominal drawing-in maneuver combined with irradiation variations.

Authors:  Young-In Hwang; Du-Jin Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-30

7.  Tape measure-based real-time feedback during the abdominal draw-in maneuver facilitates isolated transverse abdominal contraction.

Authors:  Tadanobu Suehiro; Hiroshi Ishida; Kenichi Kobara; Daisuke Fujita; Hiroshi Osaka; Susumu Watanabe
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-08-07

8.  Pattern of changes in latissimus dorsi, gluteus maximus, internal oblique and transverse abdominus muscle thickness among individuals with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Authors:  Muhammad Salman Bashir; Rabiya Noor; Mohammad Reza Hadian; Gholamreza Olyaei
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  The preferential contraction ratios of transversus abdominis on the variations of knee angles during abdominal drawing-in maneuver in wall support standing.

Authors:  Young-In Hwang; Jwa-Jun Kim; Du-Jin Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-30

10.  Assessment of the abdominal muscles at rest and during abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre in adolescent physically active girls: A case-control study.

Authors:  Pawel Linek; Edward Saulicz; Tomasz Wolny; Andrzej Myśliwiec
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 7.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.