Literature DB >> 19632673

Lucky numbers: spatial neglect affects physical, but not representational, choices in a lotto task.

Tobias Loetscher1, Michael E R Nicholls, John N Towse, John L Bradshaw, Peter Brugger.   

Abstract

Spatial neglect can be characterized by a "magnetic attraction" towards the right side of a visual stimulus array and a selection of stimuli from that hemispace. This study examined whether these distinctive characteristics in visuo-motor space are also evident in representational number space. Given that numbers are thought to be represented along a left-to-right oriented mental number line, an affinity for the spontaneous selection of larger numbers was anticipated for neglect patients. Contrary to this expectation, neglect patients (n=20) picked a similar range of numbers compared to controls (n=17) when generating a number between 1000 and 10,000 and when playing an imaginary lottery game. There was, however, a positive correlation between the biases for the imaginary lottery, number generation and a number bisection task - demonstrating that exploration asymmetries along the mental number line are consistent within individuals across tasks. Some of the patients selected smaller numbers in all of these tasks, confirming reports of dissociations between physical and numerical-representational forms of neglect. Conversely, only four (20%) of the patients could reliably be classified as demonstrating a neglect in number space. When filling out a physical lottery ticket, the neglect patients showed the expected bias towards picking numbers placed on the right-hand side of the ticket. These results demonstrate that the magnetic attraction towards the right side of mental representations is rather weak and that representational forms of neglect only occasionally co-exist with neglect in physical space. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19632673     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  10 in total

1.  Perceptual pseudoneglect in schizophrenia: candidate endophenotype and the role of the right parietal cortex.

Authors:  Michele Ribolsi; Giulia Lisi; Giorgio Di Lorenzo; Giacomo Koch; Massimiliano Oliveri; Valentina Magni; Bianca Pezzarossa; Anna Saya; Giuseppe Rociola; Ivo A Rubino; Cinzia Niolu; Alberto Siracusano
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Reduced Pseudoneglect for Physical Space, but not Mental Representations of Space, for Adults with Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Michael C W English; Murray T Maybery; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-07

Review 3.  Representational pseudoneglect: a review.

Authors:  Joanna L Brooks; Sergio Della Sala; Stephen Darling
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  The heterogeneous nature of number-space interactions.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Wim Gevers; Christophe Lafosse; Wim Fias
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Neglect impairs explicit processing of the mental number line.

Authors:  Marco Zorzi; Mario Bonato; Barbara Treccani; Giovanni Scalambrin; Roberto Marenzi; Konstantinos Priftis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Disentangling input and output-related components of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls; Amy Brodtmann; Nicole A Thomas; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Spatial displacement of numbers on a vertical number line in spatial neglect.

Authors:  Urszula Mihulowicz; Elise Klein; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Klaus Willmes; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Negative correlation between leftward bias in line bisection and schizotypal features in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Michele Ribolsi; Giulia Lisi; Giorgio Di Lorenzo; Giuseppe Rociola; Cinzia Niolu; Alberto Siracusano
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-14

9.  Not all numbers are equal: preferences and biases among children and adults when generating random sequences.

Authors:  John N Towse; Tobias Loetscher; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-23

10.  Hemispatial Neglect Shows That "Before" Is "Left".

Authors:  Mario Bonato; Arnaud Saj; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 3.599

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.