Literature DB >> 19632595

Longterm outcomes after combat casualty emergency department thoracotomy.

Jason W Edens1, Alec C Beekley, Kevin K Chung, E Darrin Cox, Brian J Eastridge, John B Holcomb, Lorne H Blackbourne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence, survival, and blood product use after emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) in combat casualties is unknown. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a prospective and retrospective observational study of EDT at a combat support hospital in Iraq, evaluating the impact of injury mechanisms, blood product use, mortality, and longterm neurologic outcomes of survivors.
RESULTS: From November 2003 to December 2007, 12,536 trauma admissions resulted in 101 EDTs (0.01%). In patients undergoing EDT, penetrating trauma from explosions and firearms accounted for the majority of injuries (93%). There were no survivors after EDT for blunt trauma (n=7). The areas of primary penetrating injury were the abdomen (30%), thorax (40%), and extremities (22%). Twelve percent (12 of 101) of all patients survived until evacuation, with the overall survival rate (8 to 26 months) of US casualties at 11% (6 of 53). There was no difference in survival seen in either injury mechanism or primary injury location. Signs of life were present in all overall survivors. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed in 92% (93 of 101) of all patients, and in 75% (9 of 12) of those evacuated. Mean (+/-SD) transfusion requirements for all patients were 15.0+/-12.7 U of RBC and 7.3+/-8.7 U of fresh frozen plasma during the initial resuscitation. Survivors demonstrated higher fresh frozen plasma:RBC ratios. All survivors were neurologically intact.
CONCLUSIONS: In the combat casualty with penetrating injury, arriving with signs of life, receiving CPR, and undergoing EDT, longterm survival with normal neurologic outcomes is possible. CPR is not a contraindication to performance of EDT in penetrating injuries if signs of life are present. A large amount of blood products are used in the resuscitation of EDT patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19632595     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta : Bridge to surgery].

Authors:  K Elias; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Resuscitative thoracotomy in penetrating trauma.

Authors:  Lindsay M Fairfax; Li Hsee; Ian D Civil
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Improving survival after an emergency resuscitative thoracotomy: a 5-year review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Bellal Joseph; Muhammad Khan; Faisal Jehan; Rifat Latifi; Peter Rhee
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2018-10-09

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy versus Closed Chest Compressions among Patients with Critical Blunt Trauma: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Authors:  Kodai Suzuki; Shigeaki Inoue; Seiji Morita; Nobuo Watanabe; Ayumi Shintani; Sadaki Inokuchi; Shinji Ogura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Chinese expert consensus on echelons treatment of thoracic injury in modern warfare.

Authors:  Zhao-Wen Zong; Zhi-Nong Wang; Si-Xu Chen; Hao Qin; Lian-Yang Zhang; Yue Shen; Lei Yang; Wen-Qiong Du; Can Chen; Xin Zhong; Lin Zhang; Jiang-Tao Huo; Li-Ping Kuai; Li-Xin Shu; Guo-Fu Du; Yu-Feng Zhao
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-10-04

Review 6.  [Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) : Current aspects of material, indications and limits: an overview].

Authors:  M Wortmann; M Engelhart; K Elias; E Popp; S Zerwes; Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 0.955

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.