Literature DB >> 19632150

Blink reflexes in chronic tension-type headache patients and healthy controls.

Anitha Peddireddy1, Kelun Wang, Peter Svensson, Lars Arendt-Nielsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use the R2 component of nociceptive-specific blink reflex (nBR) to probe the trigeminal nociceptive system and compare chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) patients and healthy controls.
METHODS: Thirty patients with CTTH and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were included. nBR were evoked by painful electrical pulses (0.5ms duration), delivered by a concentric electrode placed on the left lower forehead close to the supraorbital foramen. The EMG activity in the orbicularis oculi muscles was recorded bilaterally. The electrical stimulus intensities to evoke individual sensory threshold (Is) and pin-prick pain sensation (Ip) were assessed. A fixed stimulation intensity of 1.5x Ip was used to evoke the nBR. The perceived pain intensity of the electrical stimulus (I(BR)) was assessed by the subjects on a 0-10cm visual analogue scale (VAS).
RESULTS: Is did not differ between CTTH patients and controls (P=0.687) but were lower in females than in males (P=0.020). CTTH patients had higher scores on I(BR) than controls (P=0.026). ANOVA showed significantly higher pre-stimulus EMG values in CTTH patients on the left (stimulated) side (P<0.001), whereas there were no differences between males and females (P>0.168). There were no significant differences in the absolute values of the nBR, however CTTH patients had significantly lower values of the normalized root mean square (RMS) (P=0.035) and area under the curve (AUC) (P=0.042) of the nBR on the left side compared with control subjects with no sex-related differences (P>0.070). The onset latencies and duration were not significantly different between CTTH and control subjects or between female and male subjects (P>0.270). There was no significant correlation between any of the BR parameters (RMS, AUC) and clinical characteristics of CTTH (headache intensity and duration) (P>0.163).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study did not detect a significantly different blink reflex response in CTTH patients, but suggested that painful electrical stimulation was associated with consistent increases in eye muscle activity on the same side. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings add further information to central nociceptive pathways in CTTH patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19632150     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  5 in total

1.  Feasibility and reliability of intraorally evoked "nociceptive-specific" blink reflexes.

Authors:  Rajath Sasidharan Pillai; Cung May Thai; Laura Zweers; Michail Koutris; Frank Lobbezoo; Yuri Martins Costa; Maria Pigg; Thomas List; Peter Svensson; Lene Baad-Hansen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Reliability of the nociceptive blink reflex evoked by electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve in humans.

Authors:  Yuri Martins Costa; Lene Baad-Hansen; Leonardo Rigoldi Bonjardim; Paulo César Rodrigues Conti; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Brain Excitability in Tension-Type Headache: a Separate Entity from Migraine?

Authors:  Wei-Ta Chen; Fu-Jung Hsiao; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  Diagnostic value of some less frequently considered blink reflex parameters in idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Ivan Mikula; Snježana Miškov; Vesna Serić; Jelena Bošnjak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches.

Authors:  Gianluca Coppola; Cherubino Di Lorenzo; Jean Schoenen; Francesco Pierelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 7.277

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.