Literature DB >> 19631948

Antidepressant response trajectories and quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) biomarkers in major depressive disorder.

Aimee M Hunter1, Bengt O Muthén, Ian A Cook, Andrew F Leuchter.   

Abstract

Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) vary regarding the rate, magnitude and stability of symptom changes during antidepressant treatment. Growth mixture modeling (GMM) can be used to identify patterns of change in symptom severity over time. Quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) cordance within the first week of treatment has been associated with endpoint clinical outcomes but has not been examined in relation to patterns of symptom change. Ninety-four adults with MDD were randomized to eight weeks of double-blinded treatment with fluoxetine 20mg or venlafaxine 150mg (n=49) or placebo (n=45). An exploratory random effect GMM was applied to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D(17)) scores over 11 timepoints. Linear mixed models examined 48-h, and 1-week changes in QEEG midline-and-right-frontal (MRF) cordance for subjects in the GMM trajectory classes. Among medication subjects an estimated 62% of subjects were classified as responders, 21% as non-responders, and 17% as symptomatically volatile-i.e., showing a course of alternating improvement and worsening. MRF cordance showed a significant class-by-time interaction (F((2,41))=6.82, p=.003); as hypothesized, the responders showed a significantly greater 1-week decrease in cordance as compared to non-responders (mean difference=-.76, Std. Error=.34, df=73, p=.03) but not volatile subjects. Subjects with a volatile course of symptom change may merit special clinical consideration and, from a research perspective, may confound the interpretation of typical binary endpoint outcomes. Statistical methods such as GMM are needed to identify clinically relevant symptom response trajectories. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19631948      PMCID: PMC2925497          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  35 in total

1.  General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions.

Authors:  Bengt Muthén; C Hendricks Brown; Katherine Masyn; Booil Jo; Siek-Toon Khoo; Chih-Chien Yang; Chen-Pin Wang; Sheppard G Kellam; John B Carlin; Jason Liao
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Stephen R Wisniewski; Andrew A Nierenberg; Diane Warden; Louise Ritz; Grayson Norquist; Robert H Howland; Barry Lebowitz; Patrick J McGrath; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Melanie M Biggs; G K Balasubramani; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Is there a delay in the antidepressant effect? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Posternak; Mark Zimmerman
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Shapes of early change in psychotherapy under routine outpatient conditions.

Authors:  Niklaus Stulz; Wolfgang Lutz; Chris Leach; Mike Lucock; Michael Barkham
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-12

5.  Changes in brain function during administration of venlafaxine or placebo to normal subjects.

Authors:  Andrew F Leuchter; Ian A Cook; David J DeBrota; Aimee M Hunter; William Z Potter; Caroline C McGrouther; Melinda L Morgan; Michelle Abrams; Barbara Siegman
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes.

Authors:  B Muthén; L K Muthén
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Timing of clinical improvement and symptom resolution in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  George I Papakostas; Timothy Petersen; Katherine G Sklarsky; Andrew A Nierenberg; Jonathan E Alpert; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Early reduction in prefrontal theta QEEG cordance value predicts response to venlafaxine treatment in patients with resistant depressive disorder.

Authors:  Martin Bares; Martin Brunovsky; Miloslav Kopecek; Tomas Novak; Pavla Stopkova; Jiri Kozeny; Peter Sos; Vladimir Krajca; Cyril Höschl
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 5.361

9.  Identification of true drug response to antidepressants. Use of pattern analysis.

Authors:  F M Quitkin; J G Rabkin; D Ross; J W Stewart
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1984-08

10.  Estimating drug effects in the presence of placebo response: causal inference using growth mixture modeling.

Authors:  Bengt Muthén; Hendricks C Brown
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  25 in total

1.  Trajectories of depression severity in clinical trials of duloxetine: insights into antidepressant and placebo responses.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Craig Mallinckrodt; John H Krystal
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12

2.  Poisson Growth Mixture Modeling of Intensive Longitudinal Data: An Application to Smoking Cessation Behavior.

Authors:  Mariya P Shiyko; Yuelin Li; David Rindskopf
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.125

3.  Frontal theta cordance predicts 6-month antidepressant response to subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Paul E Holtzheimer; Matthew R Hilimire; Nathan A Parks; Jordan E Devylder; Helen S Mayberg; Paul M Corballis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Moving pharmacoepigenetics tools for depression toward clinical use.

Authors:  Laura M Hack; Gabriel R Fries; Harris A Eyre; Chad A Bousman; Ajeet B Singh; Joao Quevedo; Vineeth P John; Bernhard T Baune; Boadie W Dunlop
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Multiweek resting EEG cordance change patterns from repeated olfactory activation with two constitutionally salient homeopathic remedies in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Iris R Bell; Amy Howerter; Nicholas Jackson; Audrey J Brooks; Gary E Schwartz
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.579

6.  An Electrophysiological Biomarker That May Predict Treatment Response to ECT.

Authors:  Katherine W Scangos; Richard D Weiner; Edward C Coffey; Andrew D Krystal
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.635

7.  Identification of distinct depressive symptom trajectories in women following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Bruce A Cooper; John Neuhaus; Claudia West; Steven Paul; Bradley Aouizerat; Gary Abrams; Janet Edrington; Debby Hamolsky; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Patterns of early change and their relationship to outcome and early treatment termination in patients with panic disorder.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lutz; Stefan G Hofmann; Julian Rubel; James F Boswell; M Katherine Shear; Jack M Gorman; Scott W Woods; David H Barlow
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-01-20

Review 9.  Progress in Elucidating Biomarkers of Antidepressant Pharmacological Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Last 15 Years.

Authors:  G Voegeli; M L Cléry-Melin; N Ramoz; P Gorwood
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Antidepressant Response Trajectories and Associated Clinical Prognostic Factors Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Stephen F Smagula; Meryl A Butters; Stewart J Anderson; Eric J Lenze; Mary Amanda Dew; Benoit H Mulsant; Francis E Lotrich; Howard Aizenstein; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 21.596

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.