Literature DB >> 19631794

Urban female patients' perceptions of the family medicine clinic as a site for abortion care.

Susan E Rubin1, Emily M Godfrey, Miriam Shapiro, Marji Gold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Induced abortion is common in the US, yet there is a lack of providers. We surveyed female patients asking why they would or would not (a) accept early abortion offered by their family physician (FP) in their family medicine clinic (FMC) and (b) prefer to access abortion services in the FMC. STUDY
DESIGN: An anonymous survey with open- and closed-ended questions was conducted at three FMCs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods.
RESULTS: Four hundred forty-nine women completed the survey. Respondents supported offering medication (68.8%) and suction (43.1%) abortion in the FMC. Sixty-seven percent of the respondents who identified themselves as possibly having a future abortion (n=231) would prefer to have the abortion in their FMC. Comfort with either their provider or the FMC was the most frequently cited reason for preferring the FMC. Concern about preserving comfort at the FMC was mentioned by others as a reason for not choosing the FMC. "Expertise" was the most commonly cited reason by those who preferred a specialized abortion clinic. Anonymity or privacy was mentioned by different respondents as a benefit of care at both sites.
CONCLUSION: In order to address patient preferences and concerns, early abortion services should be offered in the FMC as well as in specialty clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19631794     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

1.  It is time to integrate abortion into primary care.

Authors:  Susan Yanow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Previous experience of spontaneous or elective abortion and risk for posttraumatic stress and depression during subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  Lydia Hamama; Sheila A M Rauch; Mickey Sperlich; Erin Defever; Julia S Seng
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.505

3.  Women's preferences for the location of abortion services: a pilot study in two Chicago clinics.

Authors:  Melissa B Logsdon; Arden Handler; Emily M Godfrey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

4.  Attitudes and preferences toward the provision of medication abortion in an urban academic internal medicine practice.

Authors:  Cameron Page; Sarah Stumbar; Marji Gold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Perspectives of internal medicine physicians regarding medication abortion provision in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Tierney Wolgemuth; Colleen Judge-Golden; Katherine Lane; Jamie Stern; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Distance traveled for Medicaid-covered abortion care in California.

Authors:  Nicole E Johns; Diana Greene Foster; Ushma D Upadhyay
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Abortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017.

Authors:  Elizabeth Witwer; Rachel K Jones; Liza Fuentes; S Kate Castle
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-10-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.