Literature DB >> 19631693

Dual-task interference: attentional and neurophysiological influences.

Cynthia Y Hiraga1, Michael I Garry, Richard G Carson, Jeffery J Summers.   

Abstract

Performing two tasks simultaneously often degrades performance of one or both tasks. While this dual-task interference is classically interpreted in terms of shared attentional resources, where two motor tasks are performed simultaneously interactions within primary motor cortex (i.e., activity-dependent coupling) may also be a contributing factor. In the present study TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) was used to examine the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference during concurrent performance of a bimanual coordination task and a discrete probe reaction time (RT) task involving the foot. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that activity-dependent coupling within the leg corticomotor pathway was greater during dual-task performance than single-task performance, and this was associated with interference on the probe RT task (i.e., increased RT). Experiment 3 revealed that dual-task interference occurred regardless of whether the dual-task involved two motor tasks or a motor and cognitive task, however activity-dependent coupling was present only when a dual motor task was performed. This suggests that activity-dependent coupling is less detrimental to performance than attentional processes operating upstream of the corticomotor system. Finally, while prioritising the RT task reduced, but did not eliminate, dual-task interference the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference was not affected by task prioritisation. This suggests that although activity-dependent coupling may contribute to dual motor-task interference, attentional processes appear to be more important. It also suggests that activity-dependent coupling may not be subject to modulation by attentional processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19631693     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Dual-task practice enhances motor learning: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Hui-Ting Goh; Katherine J Sullivan; James Gordon; Gabriele Wulf; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Task-dependent effects of interhemispheric inhibition on motor control.

Authors:  Brett W Fling; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Path perturbation detection tasks reduce MSTd neuronal self-movement heading responses.

Authors:  William K Page; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor performance of tongue with a computer-integrated system under different levels of background physical exertion.

Authors:  Xueliang Huo; Ashley N Johnson-Long; Maysam Ghovanloo; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Obstacle avoidance movement-related motor cortical activity with cognitive task.

Authors:  Akihiro Matsuura; Natsumi Sai; Ayaka Yamaoka; Tetsuya Karita; Futoshi Mori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of dual-task demands on the complexity and task performance of submaximal isometric handgrip force control.

Authors:  Benjamín Guzmán-González; Claudio Bustos-Briones; Joaquín Calatayud; Claudio Tapia; Julio Torres-Elgueta; Xavier García-Massó; Carlos Cruz-Montecinos
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Corticomotor responses to attentionally demanding motor performance: a mini-review.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Drury; Kayleigh Young; Michael Do; Tom Perkins; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-08

8.  Dual-task motor performance with a tongue-operated assistive technology compared with hand operations.

Authors:  Ashley N Johnson; Xueliang Huo; Maysam Ghovanloo; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Attentional demands of movement observation as tested by a dual task approach.

Authors:  Cinthia M Saucedo Marquez; Tanja Ceux; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Aging causes a reorganization of cortical and spinal control of posture.

Authors:  Selma Papegaaij; Wolfgang Taube; Stéphane Baudry; Egbert Otten; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.