Literature DB >> 19631673

Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.

Alison J Wiggett1, Iwan C Pritchard, Paul E Downing.   

Abstract

Evidence from neuropsychology suggests that the distinction between animate and inanimate kinds is fundamental to human cognition. Previous neuroimaging studies have reported that viewing animate objects activates ventrolateral visual brain regions, whereas inanimate objects activate ventromedial regions. However, these studies have typically compared only a small number of animate and inanimate kinds (e.g. animals and tools) and some evidence indicates that task demands determine whether these effects occur at all. In the current study we test whether a lateral-medial animacy bias is evident across a variety of stimuli, and across different tasks (matching two stimuli at a general, intermediate and exemplar level). Images of objects were presented sequentially in pairs, and match/mismatch judgements were made at different levels in different scans. The fMRI data showed ventrolateral activation for animate objects and ventromedial activation for inanimate objects. Additional analyses within these regions revealed no main effect of task, and no interactions between task and animacy. Furthermore, there were no subpopulations of voxels in any of the regions of interest that showed a significant task by animacy interaction. We conclude that ventral animate/inanimate category biases do not always depend on top-down task orientation. Furthermore, we consider whether the animate and inanimate activations reflect biases in the non-preferred responses of strongly category-selective regions such as the fusiform face area or the parahippocampal place area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19631673     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Tripartite organization of the ventral stream by animacy and object size.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sensorimotor-independent development of hands and tools selectivity in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Ella Striem-Amit; Gilles Vannuscorps; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Functional connectivity constrains the category-related organization of human ventral occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  W Dale Stevens; Michael Henry Tessler; Cynthia S Peng; Alex Martin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Individual differences in the spontaneous recruitment of brain regions supporting mental state understanding when viewing natural social scenes.

Authors:  Dylan D Wagner; William M Kelley; Todd F Heatherton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The effect of face patch microstimulation on perception of faces and objects.

Authors:  Sebastian Moeller; Trinity Crapse; Le Chang; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Fractionation of social brain circuits in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; W Kyle Simmons; Lydia A Milbury; Gregory L Wallace; Robert W Cox; Alex Martin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Extensive childhood experience with Pokémon suggests eccentricity drives organization of visual cortex.

Authors:  Jesse Gomez; Michael Barnett; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-05-06

9.  A network linking scene perception and spatial memory systems in posterior cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Adam Steel; Madeleine M Billings; Edward H Silson; Caroline E Robertson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Broad and narrow conceptual tuning in the human frontal lobes.

Authors:  Stephen J Gotts; Shawn C Milleville; Patrick S F Bellgowan; Alex Martin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.