Literature DB >> 19631315

[Ventral rectal sacropexy (colpo-perineal) in the treatment of rectal and rectogenital prolapse].

José M Enríquez-Navascués1, José L Elósegui, Francisco J Apeztegui, Carlos Placer, Nerea Borda, Martín Irazusta, José A Múgica, Javier Murgoitio.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ventral sacral-rectopexy with mesh corrects rectal prolapse and minimises rectal dissection. Subsequent colpopexy corrects apical and posterior prolapses of the vagina. The combination of both procedures can lead to the simultaneous correction of pelvic organ prolapses (POP).
OBJECTIVE: To present the results of a patient series with several types of POP treated using the same approach and operation. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: A total of 57 patients diagnosed with any type of POP were operated on between January 2005 and August 2008 using ventral rectal-colpo-sacropexy, who were grouped into three types: A, total rectal prolapse isolated or combined with a hysterocele or colpocele (11 patients); B, rectoenterocele with internal rectal invagination and/or descending perineum (4 patients); and C, middle and posterior genital compartment prolapse (42 patients). The laparoscopic approach was used in the 15 patients of groups A and B and 11 from group C. A biological mesh was used in 41 patients and a macroporous synthetic one in the rest.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in the series was 66 (19-81) years, with 55 females and 2 males. The median follow up was 25 (4-48) months. There were no major post-surgical complications. A recurrence of prolapse was recorded in one patient in group A (1/11); the 7 patients who suffered from incontinence improved after the surgery, no case of de novo constipation being recorded and an improvement in 8 of the 9 patients from groups A and B with obstructive defaecation. There were 9 (21%) recurrences detected in group C, but only 4 (9%) required reintervention. In all the recurrences a biological mesh had been used.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ventral rectal-colpo-pexy is an effective technique to correct POP. Although safe and innocuous, the results with biological meshes did not last as long.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19631315     DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2009.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp        ISSN: 0009-739X            Impact factor:   1.653


  3 in total

1.  Case-matched series of a non-cross-linked biologic versus non-absorbable mesh in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy.

Authors:  James W Ogilvie; Andrew R L Stevenson; Michael Powar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  J C Martín Del Olmo; M Toledano; M L Martín Esteban; M A Montenegro; J R Gómez; P Concejo; M Rodríguez de Castro; F Del Rio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Nasra N Alam; Sunil K Narang; Ferdinand Köckerling; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-10-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.