Literature DB >> 19631186

Acceptability, willing to purchase and use long lasting insecticide treated mosquito nets in Orissa State, India.

K Gunasekaran1, S S Sahu, K N Vijayakumar, P Jambulingam.   

Abstract

Long lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) that require no re-treatment have been advocated as an effective tool against malaria transmission. However, success of this community based intervention measure largely depends on its acceptability and proper usage by the target population, besides assuring access to bed nets. To determine the acceptability of LLIN, its usage and people's willingness to buy the net, a study was conducted in two tribal districts viz., Malkangiri (with ongoing ITN programme) and Koraput (no ITN programme) of Orissa State, India. Both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods were used to collect information regarding the objective of the study. A total of 2457 LLINs (Olyset Nets) were distributed in the selected villages of these districts at free of cost. In the study villages of Malkangiri, 58% of the households had either ITNs (73%) or other types of mosquito nets aside from the LLINs and in the villages of Koraput, only 8% had other nets, as majority (96%) informed that buying nets from market was not affordable to them. Physical verification of the nets during the house visits revealed that 75.4% and 83% (in ITNs and non-ITNs villages, respectively) of the LLINs and 76% of the other nets (including ITNs) were used by the respondents, the night before the survey as nets were in a hanging position at the time of the visit. Majority of the respondents (76-98%) felt that reduction of mosquito bites as the main perceived benefit of using the LLINs. About 55% and 67% of the respondents from non-ITNs and ITNs areas, respectively, expressed their willingness to buy the LLINs. Among them, 76.8% and 94.7% offered to pay INR<100 for a net and also ready to buy it by cash payment. Social marketing of LLINs at a subsidized price or free supply to the deserving sections of people (socially/economically poor and/or under-privileged) and ensuring the availability of nets during harvesting season could encourage people to buy and use LLINs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19631186     DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Trop        ISSN: 0001-706X            Impact factor:   3.112


  16 in total

1.  Attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding malaria prevention and treatment among pregnant women in Eastern India.

Authors:  Lora L Sabin; Abanish Rizal; Mohamad I Brooks; Mrigendra P Singh; Jordan Tuchman; Blair J Wylie; Katherine M Joyce; Kojo Yeboah-Antwi; Neeru Singh; Davidson H Hamer
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 2.  Strategies to increase the ownership and use of insecticide-treated bednets to prevent malaria.

Authors:  Lana Augustincic Polec; Jennifer Petkovic; Vivian Welch; Erin Ueffing; Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu; Jordi Pardo Pardo; Mark Grabowsky; Amir Attaran; George A Wells; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-30

3.  Malaria preventive behaviors among housewives in suburbs of Bandar-Abbas City, south of Iran: interventional design based on PRECEDE model.

Authors:  Leila Ghahremani; Mojdeh Azizi; Mohammad Djaefar Moemenbellah-Fard; Haleh Ghaem
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  A systematic review of population health interventions and Scheduled Tribes in India.

Authors:  K S Mohindra; Ronald Labonté
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature.

Authors:  Justin Pulford; Manuel W Hetzel; Miranda Bryant; Peter M Siba; Ivo Mueller
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Community knowledge and practices regarding malaria and long-lasting insecticidal nets during malaria elimination programme in an endemic area in Iran.

Authors:  Mussa Soleimani-Ahmadi; Hassan Vatandoost; Mehdi Zare; Ali Alizadeh; Mehrdad Salehi
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Response of malaria vectors to conventional insecticides in the southern districts of Odisha State, India.

Authors:  S S Sahu; K Gunasekaran; H K Raju; P Vanamail; M M Pradhan; P Jambulingam
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Recalculating the net use gap: a multi-country comparison of ITN use versus ITN access.

Authors:  Hannah Koenker; Albert Kilian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tackling the malaria problem in the South-East Asia Region: need for a change in policy?

Authors:  Kaushik Bharati; N K Ganguly
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Traditional nets interfere with the uptake of long-lasting insecticidal nets in the Peruvian Amazon: the relevance of net preference for achieving high coverage and use.

Authors:  Koen Peeters Grietens; Joan Muela Ribera; Veronica Soto; Alex Tenorio; Sarah Hoibak; Angel Rosas Aguirre; Elizabeth Toomer; Hugo Rodriguez; Alejandro Llanos Cuentas; Umberto D'Alessandro; Dionicia Gamboa; Annette Erhart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.