Literature DB >> 19630715

"My drink is larger than yours"? A literature review of self-defined drink sizes and standard drinks.

Loraine Devos-Comby1, James E Lange.   

Abstract

National health offices define drink sizes to establish guidelines for alcohol use. International variations exist in the limits and drink sizes recommended. Surveys assessing drinking levels rely on the notion of standard drink when enquiring about participants' alcohol consumption and international comparisons are difficult because of the various definitions of one standard drink. Surveys are based on the assumption that respondents know and understand the concept of standard drink and are able to use it. We reviewed studies examining participants' knowledge and understanding of the notion of standard drinks as well as their ability to pour standard drinks. Across studies, participants' drink sizes typically contained greater volumes of alcohol than one standard drink. This suggests that levels of alcohol consumption have been underestimated in previous research. The magnitude of this over-sizing effect varied based on types of drinks, vessel sizes, drinking habits, and research methods. Indeed, the effect was the greatest for mixed drinks and spirits, followed by wine and beer. It also increased with vessel size and was affected by respondents' drinking experience. Using photographs of vessels as representations of usual drinks exhibited the strongest discrepancy compared to tasks using actual vessels; and paradigms involving pouring real alcohol seemed to lead to greater effects than those using water or colored water. Lastly, evidence suggests that these misperceptions could be corrected and that such correction may reduce drink sizes. Implications of these findings are discussed and recommendations for researchers, health promotion campaigns and policy makers are made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19630715     DOI: 10.2174/1874473710801020162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev        ISSN: 1874-4737


  23 in total

1.  An empirical approach to evaluating the validity of alternative low-risk drinking guidelines.

Authors:  Deborah A Dawson; Sharon M Smith; Roger P Pickering; Bridget F Grant
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2011-09-29

Review 2.  Ethanol consumption: how should we measure it? Achieving consilience between human and animal phenotypes.

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Markus Heilig; Christopher L Cunningham; David N Stephens; Theodora Duka; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  A modified Timeline Followback assessment to capture alcohol exposure in pregnant women: Application in the Safe Passage Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Dukes; Tara Tripp; Julie Petersen; Fay Robinson; Hein Odendaal; Amy Elliott; Marian Willinger; Dale Hereld; Cheryl Raffo; Hannah C Kinney; Coen Groenewald; Jyoti Angal; Rebecca Young; Larry Burd
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 4.  Understanding standard drinks and drinking guidelines.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Tim Stockwell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2011-11-03

5.  Nine-Year Ethanol Intake Trajectories and Their Association With 15-Year Cognitive Decline Among Black and White Adults.

Authors:  Shelly-Ann M Love; Kari E North; Donglin Zeng; Natalia Petruski-Ivleva; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Priya Palta; Mariaelisa Graff; Laura Loehr; Sarah B Jones; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angela White; David Kavanagh; Helen Stallman; Britt Klein; Frances Kay-Lambkin; Judy Proudfoot; Judy Drennan; Jason Connor; Amanda Baker; Emily Hines; Ross Young
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 7.  Toward empirical identification of a clinically meaningful indicator of treatment outcome: features of candidate indicators and evaluation of sensitivity to treatment effects and relationship to one year follow up cocaine use outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen M Carroll; Brian D Kiluk; Charla Nich; Elise E DeVito; Suzanne Decker; Donna LaPaglia; Dianne Duffey; Theresa A Babuscio; Samuel A Ball
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 8.  Alcohol and acetaldehyde in public health: from marvel to menace.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Jun Ren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Changes in alcohol intake and their relationship with health status over a 24-year follow-up period in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Linda K McEvoy; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jaclyn Bergstrom; Gail A Laughlin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Moderate, Regular Alcohol Consumption is Associated with Higher Cognitive Function in Older Community-Dwelling Adults.

Authors:  E T Reas; G A Laughlin; D Kritz-Silverstein; E Barrett-Connor; L K McEvoy
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.